diff options
| author | Guillaume Gomez <guillaume1.gomez@gmail.com> | 2025-07-20 15:34:05 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2025-07-20 15:34:05 +0200 |
| commit | 2461d6ccb893254011b117b1aa4e3340b07aa65d (patch) | |
| tree | 71141e54253fde5e3fc30396b45c77d227215bf6 | |
| parent | 5ba1251b55ed560aabf92c81db6a6612de5f648e (diff) | |
| parent | 4b8f869c638e6d5090420ff46bd14e7b7d909690 (diff) | |
Rollup merge of #143720 - scottmcm:rvalue-always-operand, r=lcnr
Allow `Rvalue::Repeat` to return true in `rvalue_creates_operand` too The conversation in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/143502#discussion_r2189410911 made be realize how easy this is to handle, since the only possibilty is ZSTs -- everything else ends up with the destination being `LocalKind::Memory` and thus doesn't call `codegen_rvalue_operand` at all. This gets us perilously close to a world where `rvalue_creates_operand` only ever returns true. (See rust-lang/rust#143860 for more.)
| -rw-r--r-- | compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/rvalue.rs | 16 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/codegen/repeat-operand-zero-len.rs | 28 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/codegen/repeat-operand-zst-elem.rs | 28 |
3 files changed, 68 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/rvalue.rs b/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/rvalue.rs index 2587e89417a..e872f8434e5 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/rvalue.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/rvalue.rs @@ -630,7 +630,17 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx, Bx: BuilderMethods<'a, 'tcx>> FunctionCx<'a, 'tcx, Bx> { OperandRef { val: OperandValue::Immediate(static_), layout } } mir::Rvalue::Use(ref operand) => self.codegen_operand(bx, operand), - mir::Rvalue::Repeat(..) => bug!("{rvalue:?} in codegen_rvalue_operand"), + mir::Rvalue::Repeat(ref elem, len_const) => { + // All arrays have `BackendRepr::Memory`, so only the ZST cases + // end up here. Anything else forces the destination local to be + // `Memory`, and thus ends up handled in `codegen_rvalue` instead. + let operand = self.codegen_operand(bx, elem); + let array_ty = Ty::new_array_with_const_len(bx.tcx(), operand.layout.ty, len_const); + let array_ty = self.monomorphize(array_ty); + let array_layout = bx.layout_of(array_ty); + assert!(array_layout.is_zst()); + OperandRef { val: OperandValue::ZeroSized, layout: array_layout } + } mir::Rvalue::Aggregate(ref kind, ref fields) => { let (variant_index, active_field_index) = match **kind { mir::AggregateKind::Adt(_, variant_index, _, _, active_field_index) => { @@ -1000,12 +1010,10 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx, Bx: BuilderMethods<'a, 'tcx>> FunctionCx<'a, 'tcx, Bx> { mir::Rvalue::NullaryOp(..) | mir::Rvalue::ThreadLocalRef(_) | mir::Rvalue::Use(..) | + mir::Rvalue::Repeat(..) | // (*) mir::Rvalue::Aggregate(..) | // (*) mir::Rvalue::WrapUnsafeBinder(..) => // (*) true, - // Arrays are always aggregates, so it's not worth checking anything here. - // (If it's really `[(); N]` or `[T; 0]` and we use the place path, fine.) - mir::Rvalue::Repeat(..) => false, } // (*) this is only true if the type is suitable diff --git a/tests/codegen/repeat-operand-zero-len.rs b/tests/codegen/repeat-operand-zero-len.rs new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b4cec42a07c --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/codegen/repeat-operand-zero-len.rs @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +//@ compile-flags: -Copt-level=1 -Cno-prepopulate-passes + +// This test is here to hit the `Rvalue::Repeat` case in `codegen_rvalue_operand`. +// It only applies when the resulting array is a ZST, so the test is written in +// such a way as to keep MIR optimizations from seeing that fact and removing +// the local and statement altogether. (At the time of writing, no other codegen +// test hit that code path, nor did a stage 2 build of the compiler.) + +#![crate_type = "lib"] + +#[repr(transparent)] +pub struct Wrapper<T, const N: usize>([T; N]); + +// CHECK-LABEL: define {{.+}}do_repeat{{.+}}(i32 noundef %x) +// CHECK-NEXT: start: +// CHECK-NOT: alloca +// CHECK-NEXT: ret void +#[inline(never)] +pub fn do_repeat<T: Copy, const N: usize>(x: T) -> Wrapper<T, N> { + Wrapper([x; N]) +} + +// CHECK-LABEL: @trigger_repeat_zero_len +#[no_mangle] +pub fn trigger_repeat_zero_len() -> Wrapper<u32, 0> { + // CHECK: call void {{.+}}do_repeat{{.+}}(i32 noundef 4) + do_repeat(4) +} diff --git a/tests/codegen/repeat-operand-zst-elem.rs b/tests/codegen/repeat-operand-zst-elem.rs new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c3637759afa --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/codegen/repeat-operand-zst-elem.rs @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +//@ compile-flags: -Copt-level=1 -Cno-prepopulate-passes + +// This test is here to hit the `Rvalue::Repeat` case in `codegen_rvalue_operand`. +// It only applies when the resulting array is a ZST, so the test is written in +// such a way as to keep MIR optimizations from seeing that fact and removing +// the local and statement altogether. (At the time of writing, no other codegen +// test hit that code path, nor did a stage 2 build of the compiler.) + +#![crate_type = "lib"] + +#[repr(transparent)] +pub struct Wrapper<T, const N: usize>([T; N]); + +// CHECK-LABEL: define {{.+}}do_repeat{{.+}}() +// CHECK-NEXT: start: +// CHECK-NOT: alloca +// CHECK-NEXT: ret void +#[inline(never)] +pub fn do_repeat<T: Copy, const N: usize>(x: T) -> Wrapper<T, N> { + Wrapper([x; N]) +} + +// CHECK-LABEL: @trigger_repeat_zst_elem +#[no_mangle] +pub fn trigger_repeat_zst_elem() -> Wrapper<(), 8> { + // CHECK: call void {{.+}}do_repeat{{.+}}() + do_repeat(()) +} |
