diff options
| author | bors <bors@rust-lang.org> | 2023-12-23 16:17:35 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bors <bors@rust-lang.org> | 2023-12-23 16:17:35 +0000 |
| commit | 830f1c58f4a1f93de617a1bc9edb5a2709141809 (patch) | |
| tree | 8b1471cb75f9b09d2f55e4e2983834f7e4c2c3a5 | |
| parent | 618fd4b494b428411d7b81e63e5172e9b1dc25b1 (diff) | |
| parent | e44caea259aef82b81ed50a3b37f4225451a5f8f (diff) | |
| download | rust-830f1c58f4a1f93de617a1bc9edb5a2709141809.tar.gz rust-830f1c58f4a1f93de617a1bc9edb5a2709141809.zip | |
Auto merge of #11994 - y21:issue11993-fn, r=xFrednet
[`question_mark`]: also trigger on `return` statements
This fixes the false negative mentioned in #11993: the lint only used to check for `return` expressions, and not a statement containing a `return` expression (doesn't close the issue tho since there's still a useful suggestion that we could make, which is to suggest `.ok_or()?`/`.ok_or_else()?` for `else { return Err(..) }`)
changelog: [`question_mark`]: also trigger on `return` statements
| -rw-r--r-- | clippy_lints/src/matches/manual_utils.rs | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | clippy_lints/src/matches/redundant_pattern_match.rs | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | clippy_lints/src/question_mark.rs | 29 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | clippy_lints/src/undocumented_unsafe_blocks.rs | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/ui/manual_let_else_question_mark.fixed | 21 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/ui/manual_let_else_question_mark.rs | 23 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/ui/manual_let_else_question_mark.stderr | 10 |
7 files changed, 78 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/clippy_lints/src/matches/manual_utils.rs b/clippy_lints/src/matches/manual_utils.rs index 0627e458dfe..152aba99ce9 100644 --- a/clippy_lints/src/matches/manual_utils.rs +++ b/clippy_lints/src/matches/manual_utils.rs @@ -63,9 +63,7 @@ where return None; } - let Some(some_expr) = get_some_expr_fn(cx, some_pat, some_expr, expr_ctxt) else { - return None; - }; + let some_expr = get_some_expr_fn(cx, some_pat, some_expr, expr_ctxt)?; // These two lints will go back and forth with each other. if cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(some_expr.expr) == cx.tcx.types.unit diff --git a/clippy_lints/src/matches/redundant_pattern_match.rs b/clippy_lints/src/matches/redundant_pattern_match.rs index e32261ec1e4..60331337e56 100644 --- a/clippy_lints/src/matches/redundant_pattern_match.rs +++ b/clippy_lints/src/matches/redundant_pattern_match.rs @@ -128,9 +128,7 @@ fn find_method_and_type<'tcx>( if is_wildcard || is_rest { let res = cx.typeck_results().qpath_res(qpath, check_pat.hir_id); - let Some(id) = res.opt_def_id().map(|ctor_id| cx.tcx.parent(ctor_id)) else { - return None; - }; + let id = res.opt_def_id().map(|ctor_id| cx.tcx.parent(ctor_id))?; let lang_items = cx.tcx.lang_items(); if Some(id) == lang_items.result_ok_variant() { Some(("is_ok()", try_get_generic_ty(op_ty, 0).unwrap_or(op_ty))) diff --git a/clippy_lints/src/question_mark.rs b/clippy_lints/src/question_mark.rs index 6add1a81a0a..509d9483e1d 100644 --- a/clippy_lints/src/question_mark.rs +++ b/clippy_lints/src/question_mark.rs @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ use clippy_utils::ty::is_type_diagnostic_item; use clippy_utils::{ eq_expr_value, get_parent_node, higher, in_constant, is_else_clause, is_lint_allowed, is_path_lang_item, is_res_lang_ctor, pat_and_expr_can_be_question_mark, path_to_local, path_to_local_id, peel_blocks, - peel_blocks_with_stmt, + peel_blocks_with_stmt, span_contains_comment, }; use rustc_errors::Applicability; use rustc_hir::def::Res; @@ -96,6 +96,24 @@ enum IfBlockType<'hir> { ), } +fn find_let_else_ret_expression<'hir>(block: &'hir Block<'hir>) -> Option<&'hir Expr<'hir>> { + if let Block { + stmts: &[], + expr: Some(els), + .. + } = block + { + Some(els) + } else if let [stmt] = block.stmts + && let StmtKind::Semi(expr) = stmt.kind + && let ExprKind::Ret(..) = expr.kind + { + Some(expr) + } else { + None + } +} + fn check_let_some_else_return_none(cx: &LateContext<'_>, stmt: &Stmt<'_>) { if let StmtKind::Local(Local { pat, @@ -103,12 +121,9 @@ fn check_let_some_else_return_none(cx: &LateContext<'_>, stmt: &Stmt<'_>) { els: Some(els), .. }) = stmt.kind - && let Block { - stmts: &[], - expr: Some(els), - .. - } = els - && let Some(inner_pat) = pat_and_expr_can_be_question_mark(cx, pat, els) + && let Some(ret) = find_let_else_ret_expression(els) + && let Some(inner_pat) = pat_and_expr_can_be_question_mark(cx, pat, ret) + && !span_contains_comment(cx.tcx.sess.source_map(), els.span) { let mut applicability = Applicability::MaybeIncorrect; let init_expr_str = snippet_with_applicability(cx, init_expr.span, "..", &mut applicability); diff --git a/clippy_lints/src/undocumented_unsafe_blocks.rs b/clippy_lints/src/undocumented_unsafe_blocks.rs index 7a6549a7c54..e5bc3b5a25f 100644 --- a/clippy_lints/src/undocumented_unsafe_blocks.rs +++ b/clippy_lints/src/undocumented_unsafe_blocks.rs @@ -680,9 +680,7 @@ fn text_has_safety_comment(src: &str, line_starts: &[RelativeBytePos], start_pos }) .filter(|(_, text)| !text.is_empty()); - let Some((line_start, line)) = lines.next() else { - return None; - }; + let (line_start, line) = lines.next()?; // Check for a sequence of line comments. if line.starts_with("//") { let (mut line, mut line_start) = (line, line_start); diff --git a/tests/ui/manual_let_else_question_mark.fixed b/tests/ui/manual_let_else_question_mark.fixed index b555186cc22..6b29ce75985 100644 --- a/tests/ui/manual_let_else_question_mark.fixed +++ b/tests/ui/manual_let_else_question_mark.fixed @@ -60,3 +60,24 @@ fn foo() -> Option<()> { Some(()) } + +// lint not just `return None`, but also `return None;` (note the semicolon) +fn issue11993(y: Option<i32>) -> Option<i32> { + let x = y?; + + // don't lint: more than one statement in the else body + let Some(x) = y else { + todo!(); + return None; + }; + + let Some(x) = y else { + // Roses are red, + // violets are blue, + // please keep this comment, + // it's art, you know? + return None; + }; + + None +} diff --git a/tests/ui/manual_let_else_question_mark.rs b/tests/ui/manual_let_else_question_mark.rs index 5852c7094a4..e92c4c1375e 100644 --- a/tests/ui/manual_let_else_question_mark.rs +++ b/tests/ui/manual_let_else_question_mark.rs @@ -65,3 +65,26 @@ fn foo() -> Option<()> { Some(()) } + +// lint not just `return None`, but also `return None;` (note the semicolon) +fn issue11993(y: Option<i32>) -> Option<i32> { + let Some(x) = y else { + return None; + }; + + // don't lint: more than one statement in the else body + let Some(x) = y else { + todo!(); + return None; + }; + + let Some(x) = y else { + // Roses are red, + // violets are blue, + // please keep this comment, + // it's art, you know? + return None; + }; + + None +} diff --git a/tests/ui/manual_let_else_question_mark.stderr b/tests/ui/manual_let_else_question_mark.stderr index bf0b1bbf0dd..dec6947697a 100644 --- a/tests/ui/manual_let_else_question_mark.stderr +++ b/tests/ui/manual_let_else_question_mark.stderr @@ -53,5 +53,13 @@ error: this could be rewritten as `let...else` LL | let v = if let Some(v_some) = g() { v_some } else { return None }; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider writing: `let Some(v) = g() else { return None };` -error: aborting due to 6 previous errors +error: this `let...else` may be rewritten with the `?` operator + --> $DIR/manual_let_else_question_mark.rs:71:5 + | +LL | / let Some(x) = y else { +LL | | return None; +LL | | }; + | |______^ help: replace it with: `let x = y?;` + +error: aborting due to 7 previous errors |
