Record certainty before evaluating nesteds, so we make candidates

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/eval_ctxt/canonical.rs b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/eval_ctxt/canonical.rs
index 6722abd709c..d6bf2b596ef 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/eval_ctxt/canonical.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/eval_ctxt/canonical.rs
@@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
         &mut self,
         certainty: Certainty,
     ) -> QueryResult<'tcx> {
+        self.inspect.make_canonical_response(certainty);
+
         let goals_certainty = self.try_evaluate_added_goals()?;
         assert_eq!(
             self.tainted,
@@ -98,8 +100,6 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
             previous call to `try_evaluate_added_goals!`"
         );
 
-        self.inspect.make_canonical_response(certainty);
-
         // When normalizing, we've replaced the expected term with an unconstrained
         // inference variable. This means that we dropped information which could
         // have been important. We handle this by instead returning the nested goals