Change `binary_asm_labels` to only fire on x86 and x86_64

In <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/126922>, the
`binary_asm_labels` lint was added which flags labels such as `0:` and
`1:`. Before that change, LLVM was giving a confusing error on
x86/x86_64 because of an incorrect interpretation.

However, targets other than x86 and x86_64 never had the error message
and have not been a problem. This means that the lint was causing code
that previously worked to start failing (e.g. `compiler_builtins`),
rather than only providing a more clear messages where there has always
been an error.

Adjust the lint to only fire on x86 and x86_64 assembly to avoid this
regression.

2 files changed, 33 insertions, 9 deletions

diff --git a/compiler/rustc_lint/src/builtin.rs b/compiler/rustc_lint/src/builtin.rs
index 485c214ac9d..9fba53196f6 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_lint/src/builtin.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_lint/src/builtin.rs
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ use rustc_span::source_map::Spanned;
 use rustc_span::symbol::{kw, sym, Ident, Symbol};
 use rustc_span::{BytePos, InnerSpan, Span};
 use rustc_target::abi::Abi;
+use rustc_target::asm::InlineAsmArch;
 use rustc_trait_selection::infer::{InferCtxtExt, TyCtxtInferExt};
 use rustc_trait_selection::traits::query::evaluate_obligation::InferCtxtExt as _;
 use rustc_trait_selection::traits::{self, misc::type_allowed_to_implement_copy};
@@ -2908,16 +2909,22 @@ impl<'tcx> LateLintPass<'tcx> for AsmLabels {
                                 InvalidAsmLabel::FormatArg { missing_precise_span },
                             );
                         }
-                        AsmLabelKind::Binary => {
-                            // the binary asm issue only occurs when using intel syntax
-                            if !options.contains(InlineAsmOptions::ATT_SYNTAX) {
-                                cx.emit_span_lint(
-                                    BINARY_ASM_LABELS,
-                                    span,
-                                    InvalidAsmLabel::Binary { missing_precise_span, span },
-                                )
-                            }
+                        // the binary asm issue only occurs when using intel syntax on x86 targets
+                        AsmLabelKind::Binary
+                            if !options.contains(InlineAsmOptions::ATT_SYNTAX)
+                                && matches!(
+                                    cx.tcx.sess.asm_arch,
+                                    Some(InlineAsmArch::X86 | InlineAsmArch::X86_64) | None
+                                ) =>
+                        {
+                            cx.emit_span_lint(
+                                BINARY_ASM_LABELS,
+                                span,
+                                InvalidAsmLabel::Binary { missing_precise_span, span },
+                            )
                         }
+                        // No lint on anything other than x86
+                        AsmLabelKind::Binary => (),
                     };
                 }
             }
diff --git a/tests/ui/asm/binary_asm_labels_allowed.rs b/tests/ui/asm/binary_asm_labels_allowed.rs
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a21ab8d70f5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/ui/asm/binary_asm_labels_allowed.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+//@ build-pass
+//@ only-aarch64
+
+// The `binary_asm_labels` lint should only be raised on `x86`. Make sure it
+// doesn't get raised on other platforms.
+
+use std::arch::asm;
+
+fn main() {
+    unsafe {
+        asm!("0: bl 0b");
+        asm!("1: bl 1b");
+        asm!("10: bl 10b");
+        asm!("01: bl 01b");
+        asm!("1001101: bl 1001101b");
+    }
+}