diff options
| author | bors <bors@rust-lang.org> | 2023-11-24 12:18:11 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bors <bors@rust-lang.org> | 2023-11-24 12:18:11 +0000 |
| commit | 96eab0655fc5afee4d93db05bed7126160c35254 (patch) | |
| tree | de45a1f71c4e7690b254193cdfd332ab8b12a689 | |
| parent | c3243f99426683ba14deb27279af2553e8a18714 (diff) | |
| parent | 553857bb2b7c4fa79f342d3797f421121d87e9d1 (diff) | |
Auto merge of #11859 - y21:issue11856, r=blyxyas
[`missing_asserts_for_indexing`]: work with bodies instead of blocks separately
Fixes #11856
Before this change, this lint would check blocks independently of each other, which means that it misses `assert!()`s from parent blocks.
```rs
// check_block
assert!(x.len() > 1);
{
// check_block
// no assert here
let _ = x[0] + x[1];
}
```
This PR changes it to work with bodies rather than individual blocks. That means that a function will be checked in one go and we can remember if an `assert!` occurred anywhere.
Eventually it would be nice to have a more control flow-aware analysis, possibly by rewriting it as a MIR lint, but that's more complicated and I wanted this fixed first.
changelog: [`missing_asserts_for_indexing`]: accept `assert!`s from parent blocks
| -rw-r--r-- | clippy_lints/src/missing_asserts_for_indexing.rs | 6 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/ui/missing_asserts_for_indexing_unfixable.rs | 22 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/ui/missing_asserts_for_indexing_unfixable.stderr | 21 |
3 files changed, 45 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/clippy_lints/src/missing_asserts_for_indexing.rs b/clippy_lints/src/missing_asserts_for_indexing.rs index ff2792faf57..5d6dc8d5582 100644 --- a/clippy_lints/src/missing_asserts_for_indexing.rs +++ b/clippy_lints/src/missing_asserts_for_indexing.rs @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ use clippy_utils::{eq_expr_value, hash_expr, higher}; use rustc_ast::{LitKind, RangeLimits}; use rustc_data_structures::unhash::UnhashMap; use rustc_errors::{Applicability, Diagnostic}; -use rustc_hir::{BinOp, Block, Expr, ExprKind, UnOp}; +use rustc_hir::{BinOp, Block, Body, Expr, ExprKind, UnOp}; use rustc_lint::{LateContext, LateLintPass}; use rustc_session::{declare_lint_pass, declare_tool_lint}; use rustc_span::source_map::Spanned; @@ -390,10 +390,10 @@ fn report_indexes(cx: &LateContext<'_>, map: &UnhashMap<u64, Vec<IndexEntry<'_>> } impl LateLintPass<'_> for MissingAssertsForIndexing { - fn check_block(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'_>, block: &Block<'_>) { + fn check_body(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'_>, body: &Body<'_>) { let mut map = UnhashMap::default(); - for_each_expr(block, |expr| { + for_each_expr(body.value, |expr| { check_index(cx, expr, &mut map); check_assert(cx, expr, &mut map); ControlFlow::<!, ()>::Continue(()) diff --git a/tests/ui/missing_asserts_for_indexing_unfixable.rs b/tests/ui/missing_asserts_for_indexing_unfixable.rs index 4346ed892f2..de53079a476 100644 --- a/tests/ui/missing_asserts_for_indexing_unfixable.rs +++ b/tests/ui/missing_asserts_for_indexing_unfixable.rs @@ -46,4 +46,26 @@ fn index_struct_different_fields(f: &Foo<'_>) { let _ = f.v[0] + f.v2[1]; } +fn shadowing() { + let x: &[i32] = &[1]; + assert!(x.len() > 1); + + let x: &[i32] = &[1]; + let _ = x[0] + x[1]; + //~^ ERROR: indexing into a slice multiple times without an `assert` +} + +pub fn issue11856(values: &[i32]) -> usize { + let mut ascending = Vec::new(); + for w in values.windows(2) { + assert!(w.len() > 1); + if w[0] < w[1] { + ascending.push((w[0], w[1])); + } else { + ascending.push((w[1], w[0])); + } + } + ascending.len() +} + fn main() {} diff --git a/tests/ui/missing_asserts_for_indexing_unfixable.stderr b/tests/ui/missing_asserts_for_indexing_unfixable.stderr index 12c9eed5d66..12e05422798 100644 --- a/tests/ui/missing_asserts_for_indexing_unfixable.stderr +++ b/tests/ui/missing_asserts_for_indexing_unfixable.stderr @@ -160,5 +160,24 @@ LL | let _ = f.v[0] + f.v[1]; | ^^^^^^ = note: asserting the length before indexing will elide bounds checks -error: aborting due to 7 previous errors +error: indexing into a slice multiple times without an `assert` + --> $DIR/missing_asserts_for_indexing_unfixable.rs:54:13 + | +LL | let _ = x[0] + x[1]; + | ^^^^^^^^^^^ + | + = help: consider asserting the length before indexing: `assert!(x.len() > 1);` +note: slice indexed here + --> $DIR/missing_asserts_for_indexing_unfixable.rs:54:13 + | +LL | let _ = x[0] + x[1]; + | ^^^^ +note: slice indexed here + --> $DIR/missing_asserts_for_indexing_unfixable.rs:54:20 + | +LL | let _ = x[0] + x[1]; + | ^^^^ + = note: asserting the length before indexing will elide bounds checks + +error: aborting due to 8 previous errors |
