diff options
| author | bors <bors@rust-lang.org> | 2022-05-28 04:04:29 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bors <bors@rust-lang.org> | 2022-05-28 04:04:29 +0000 |
| commit | ed76b773b57cf0aa48ec4e2fc6d6a3f7a9079491 (patch) | |
| tree | 3ec0e6ff4813c0970206a5ef9b3b86bcb4f65d06 /compiler/rustc_borrowck | |
| parent | 764b8615e9149431d8790e3c07cb663642fe393d (diff) | |
| parent | 3c6c8d5a8dbf4db20450ed5793ef35f29c13466c (diff) | |
| download | rust-ed76b773b57cf0aa48ec4e2fc6d6a3f7a9079491.tar.gz rust-ed76b773b57cf0aa48ec4e2fc6d6a3f7a9079491.zip | |
Auto merge of #97284 - b-naber:constraint-dyn-impl-suggestion, r=estebank
Add suggestion for relaxing static lifetime bounds on dyn trait impls in NLL This PR introduces suggestions for relaxing static lifetime bounds on impls of dyn trait items for NLL similar to what is already available in lexical region diagnostics. Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/95701 r? `@estebank`
Diffstat (limited to 'compiler/rustc_borrowck')
10 files changed, 263 insertions, 64 deletions
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/constraints/mod.rs b/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/constraints/mod.rs index 6d5466c0c41..a504d0c9122 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/constraints/mod.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/constraints/mod.rs @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ pub struct OutlivesConstraint<'tcx> { pub span: Span, /// What caused this constraint? - pub category: ConstraintCategory, + pub category: ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, /// Variance diagnostic information pub variance_info: VarianceDiagInfo<'tcx>, diff --git a/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/diagnostics/conflict_errors.rs b/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/diagnostics/conflict_errors.rs index da5f56704d4..191574d7a8f 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/diagnostics/conflict_errors.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/diagnostics/conflict_errors.rs @@ -788,7 +788,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'cx, 'tcx> { err: &mut Diagnostic, location: Location, issued_borrow: &BorrowData<'tcx>, - explanation: BorrowExplanation, + explanation: BorrowExplanation<'tcx>, ) { let used_in_call = matches!( explanation, @@ -1088,7 +1088,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'cx, 'tcx> { BorrowExplanation::MustBeValidFor { category: category @ (ConstraintCategory::Return(_) - | ConstraintCategory::CallArgument + | ConstraintCategory::CallArgument(_) | ConstraintCategory::OpaqueType), from_closure: false, ref region_name, @@ -1147,7 +1147,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'cx, 'tcx> { borrow: &BorrowData<'tcx>, drop_span: Span, borrow_spans: UseSpans<'tcx>, - explanation: BorrowExplanation, + explanation: BorrowExplanation<'tcx>, ) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'cx, ErrorGuaranteed> { debug!( "report_local_value_does_not_live_long_enough(\ @@ -1352,7 +1352,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'cx, 'tcx> { drop_span: Span, borrow_spans: UseSpans<'tcx>, proper_span: Span, - explanation: BorrowExplanation, + explanation: BorrowExplanation<'tcx>, ) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'cx, ErrorGuaranteed> { debug!( "report_temporary_value_does_not_live_long_enough(\ @@ -1410,7 +1410,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'cx, 'tcx> { borrow: &BorrowData<'tcx>, borrow_span: Span, return_span: Span, - category: ConstraintCategory, + category: ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, opt_place_desc: Option<&String>, ) -> Option<DiagnosticBuilder<'cx, ErrorGuaranteed>> { let return_kind = match category { @@ -1508,7 +1508,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'cx, 'tcx> { use_span: UseSpans<'tcx>, var_span: Span, fr_name: &RegionName, - category: ConstraintCategory, + category: ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, constraint_span: Span, captured_var: &str, ) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'cx, ErrorGuaranteed> { @@ -1559,7 +1559,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'cx, 'tcx> { let msg = format!("{} is returned here", kind); err.span_note(constraint_span, &msg); } - ConstraintCategory::CallArgument => { + ConstraintCategory::CallArgument(_) => { fr_name.highlight_region_name(&mut err); if matches!(use_span.generator_kind(), Some(GeneratorKind::Async(_))) { err.note( diff --git a/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/diagnostics/explain_borrow.rs b/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/diagnostics/explain_borrow.rs index 0b6be453b92..5d9e5907dff 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/diagnostics/explain_borrow.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/diagnostics/explain_borrow.rs @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ use crate::{ use super::{find_use, RegionName, UseSpans}; #[derive(Debug)] -pub(crate) enum BorrowExplanation { +pub(crate) enum BorrowExplanation<'tcx> { UsedLater(LaterUseKind, Span, Option<Span>), UsedLaterInLoop(LaterUseKind, Span, Option<Span>), UsedLaterWhenDropped { @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ pub(crate) enum BorrowExplanation { should_note_order: bool, }, MustBeValidFor { - category: ConstraintCategory, + category: ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, from_closure: bool, span: Span, region_name: RegionName, @@ -51,11 +51,11 @@ pub(crate) enum LaterUseKind { Other, } -impl BorrowExplanation { +impl<'tcx> BorrowExplanation<'tcx> { pub(crate) fn is_explained(&self) -> bool { !matches!(self, BorrowExplanation::Unexplained) } - pub(crate) fn add_explanation_to_diagnostic<'tcx>( + pub(crate) fn add_explanation_to_diagnostic( &self, tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, body: &Body<'tcx>, @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ impl BorrowExplanation { pub(crate) fn add_lifetime_bound_suggestion_to_diagnostic( &self, err: &mut Diagnostic, - category: &ConstraintCategory, + category: &ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, span: Span, region_name: &RegionName, ) { @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'cx, 'tcx> { &self, borrow_region: RegionVid, outlived_region: RegionVid, - ) -> (ConstraintCategory, bool, Span, Option<RegionName>) { + ) -> (ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, bool, Span, Option<RegionName>) { let BlameConstraint { category, from_closure, cause, variance_info: _ } = self.regioncx.best_blame_constraint( &self.body, @@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'cx, 'tcx> { location: Location, borrow: &BorrowData<'tcx>, kind_place: Option<(WriteKind, Place<'tcx>)>, - ) -> BorrowExplanation { + ) -> BorrowExplanation<'tcx> { debug!( "explain_why_borrow_contains_point(location={:?}, borrow={:?}, kind_place={:?})", location, borrow, kind_place diff --git a/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/diagnostics/outlives_suggestion.rs b/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/diagnostics/outlives_suggestion.rs index 1688d1259fa..9d81330745f 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/diagnostics/outlives_suggestion.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/diagnostics/outlives_suggestion.rs @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ impl OutlivesSuggestionBuilder { pub(crate) fn intermediate_suggestion( &mut self, mbcx: &MirBorrowckCtxt<'_, '_>, - errci: &ErrorConstraintInfo, + errci: &ErrorConstraintInfo<'_>, diag: &mut Diagnostic, ) { // Emit an intermediate note. diff --git a/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/diagnostics/region_errors.rs b/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/diagnostics/region_errors.rs index 6478a104815..35f805ce76e 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/diagnostics/region_errors.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/diagnostics/region_errors.rs @@ -1,10 +1,14 @@ //! Error reporting machinery for lifetime errors. -use rustc_errors::{Diagnostic, DiagnosticBuilder, ErrorGuaranteed}; +use rustc_data_structures::stable_set::FxHashSet; +use rustc_errors::{Applicability, Diagnostic, DiagnosticBuilder, ErrorGuaranteed, MultiSpan}; +use rustc_hir::def_id::DefId; +use rustc_hir::intravisit::Visitor; +use rustc_hir::{self as hir, Item, ItemKind, Node}; use rustc_infer::infer::{ error_reporting::nice_region_error::{ self, find_anon_type, find_param_with_region, suggest_adding_lifetime_params, - NiceRegionError, + HirTraitObjectVisitor, NiceRegionError, TraitObjectVisitor, }, error_reporting::unexpected_hidden_region_diagnostic, NllRegionVariableOrigin, RelateParamBound, @@ -12,8 +16,11 @@ use rustc_infer::infer::{ use rustc_middle::hir::place::PlaceBase; use rustc_middle::mir::{ConstraintCategory, ReturnConstraint}; use rustc_middle::ty::subst::InternalSubsts; +use rustc_middle::ty::Region; +use rustc_middle::ty::TypeVisitor; use rustc_middle::ty::{self, RegionVid, Ty}; use rustc_span::symbol::sym; +use rustc_span::symbol::Ident; use rustc_span::Span; use crate::borrowck_errors; @@ -27,7 +34,7 @@ use crate::{ MirBorrowckCtxt, }; -impl ConstraintDescription for ConstraintCategory { +impl<'tcx> ConstraintDescription for ConstraintCategory<'tcx> { fn description(&self) -> &'static str { // Must end with a space. Allows for empty names to be provided. match self { @@ -37,7 +44,7 @@ impl ConstraintDescription for ConstraintCategory { ConstraintCategory::UseAsConst => "using this value as a constant ", ConstraintCategory::UseAsStatic => "using this value as a static ", ConstraintCategory::Cast => "cast ", - ConstraintCategory::CallArgument => "argument ", + ConstraintCategory::CallArgument(_) => "argument ", ConstraintCategory::TypeAnnotation => "type annotation ", ConstraintCategory::ClosureBounds => "closure body ", ConstraintCategory::SizedBound => "proving this value is `Sized` ", @@ -101,7 +108,7 @@ pub(crate) enum RegionErrorKind<'tcx> { /// Information about the various region constraints involved in a borrow checker error. #[derive(Clone, Debug)] -pub struct ErrorConstraintInfo { +pub struct ErrorConstraintInfo<'tcx> { // fr: outlived_fr pub(super) fr: RegionVid, pub(super) fr_is_local: bool, @@ -109,7 +116,7 @@ pub struct ErrorConstraintInfo { pub(super) outlived_fr_is_local: bool, // Category and span for best blame constraint - pub(super) category: ConstraintCategory, + pub(super) category: ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, pub(super) span: Span, } @@ -256,6 +263,70 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { outlives_suggestion.add_suggestion(self); } + fn get_impl_ident_and_self_ty_from_trait( + &self, + def_id: DefId, + trait_objects: &FxHashSet<DefId>, + ) -> Option<(Ident, &'tcx hir::Ty<'tcx>)> { + let tcx = self.infcx.tcx; + match tcx.hir().get_if_local(def_id) { + Some(Node::ImplItem(impl_item)) => { + match tcx.hir().find_by_def_id(tcx.hir().get_parent_item(impl_item.hir_id())) { + Some(Node::Item(Item { + kind: ItemKind::Impl(hir::Impl { self_ty, .. }), + .. + })) => Some((impl_item.ident, self_ty)), + _ => None, + } + } + Some(Node::TraitItem(trait_item)) => { + let trait_did = tcx.hir().get_parent_item(trait_item.hir_id()); + match tcx.hir().find_by_def_id(trait_did) { + Some(Node::Item(Item { kind: ItemKind::Trait(..), .. })) => { + // The method being called is defined in the `trait`, but the `'static` + // obligation comes from the `impl`. Find that `impl` so that we can point + // at it in the suggestion. + let trait_did = trait_did.to_def_id(); + match tcx + .hir() + .trait_impls(trait_did) + .iter() + .filter_map(|&impl_did| { + match tcx.hir().get_if_local(impl_did.to_def_id()) { + Some(Node::Item(Item { + kind: ItemKind::Impl(hir::Impl { self_ty, .. }), + .. + })) if trait_objects.iter().all(|did| { + // FIXME: we should check `self_ty` against the receiver + // type in the `UnifyReceiver` context, but for now, use + // this imperfect proxy. This will fail if there are + // multiple `impl`s for the same trait like + // `impl Foo for Box<dyn Bar>` and `impl Foo for dyn Bar`. + // In that case, only the first one will get suggestions. + let mut traits = vec![]; + let mut hir_v = HirTraitObjectVisitor(&mut traits, *did); + hir_v.visit_ty(self_ty); + !traits.is_empty() + }) => + { + Some(self_ty) + } + _ => None, + } + }) + .next() + { + Some(self_ty) => Some((trait_item.ident, self_ty)), + _ => None, + } + } + _ => None, + } + } + _ => None, + } + } + /// Report an error because the universal region `fr` was required to outlive /// `outlived_fr` but it is not known to do so. For example: /// @@ -279,6 +350,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { }); debug!("report_region_error: category={:?} {:?} {:?}", category, cause, variance_info); + // Check if we can use one of the "nice region errors". if let (Some(f), Some(o)) = (self.to_error_region(fr), self.to_error_region(outlived_fr)) { let nice = NiceRegionError::new_from_span(self.infcx, cause.span, o, f); @@ -312,7 +384,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { self.report_fnmut_error(&errci, kind) } (ConstraintCategory::Assignment, true, false) - | (ConstraintCategory::CallArgument, true, false) => { + | (ConstraintCategory::CallArgument(_), true, false) => { let mut db = self.report_escaping_data_error(&errci); outlives_suggestion.intermediate_suggestion(self, &errci, &mut db); @@ -405,7 +477,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { /// ``` fn report_fnmut_error( &self, - errci: &ErrorConstraintInfo, + errci: &ErrorConstraintInfo<'tcx>, kind: ReturnConstraint, ) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx, ErrorGuaranteed> { let ErrorConstraintInfo { outlived_fr, span, .. } = errci; @@ -486,7 +558,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { /// ``` fn report_escaping_data_error( &self, - errci: &ErrorConstraintInfo, + errci: &ErrorConstraintInfo<'tcx>, ) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx, ErrorGuaranteed> { let ErrorConstraintInfo { span, category, .. } = errci; @@ -548,24 +620,28 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { // Only show an extra note if we can find an 'error region' for both of the region // variables. This avoids showing a noisy note that just mentions 'synthetic' regions // that don't help the user understand the error. - if self.to_error_region(errci.fr).is_some() - && self.to_error_region(errci.outlived_fr).is_some() - { - let fr_region_name = self.give_region_a_name(errci.fr).unwrap(); - fr_region_name.highlight_region_name(&mut diag); - let outlived_fr_region_name = self.give_region_a_name(errci.outlived_fr).unwrap(); - outlived_fr_region_name.highlight_region_name(&mut diag); + match (self.to_error_region(errci.fr), self.to_error_region(errci.outlived_fr)) { + (Some(f), Some(o)) => { + self.maybe_suggest_constrain_dyn_trait_impl(&mut diag, f, o, category); - diag.span_label( - *span, - format!( - "{}requires that `{}` must outlive `{}`", - category.description(), - fr_region_name, - outlived_fr_region_name, - ), - ); + let fr_region_name = self.give_region_a_name(errci.fr).unwrap(); + fr_region_name.highlight_region_name(&mut diag); + let outlived_fr_region_name = self.give_region_a_name(errci.outlived_fr).unwrap(); + outlived_fr_region_name.highlight_region_name(&mut diag); + + diag.span_label( + *span, + format!( + "{}requires that `{}` must outlive `{}`", + category.description(), + fr_region_name, + outlived_fr_region_name, + ), + ); + } + _ => {} } + diag } @@ -586,7 +662,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { /// ``` fn report_general_error( &self, - errci: &ErrorConstraintInfo, + errci: &ErrorConstraintInfo<'tcx>, ) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx, ErrorGuaranteed> { let ErrorConstraintInfo { fr, @@ -699,6 +775,100 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { } } + fn maybe_suggest_constrain_dyn_trait_impl( + &self, + diag: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx, ErrorGuaranteed>, + f: Region<'tcx>, + o: Region<'tcx>, + category: &ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, + ) { + if !o.is_static() { + return; + } + + let tcx = self.infcx.tcx; + + let instance = if let ConstraintCategory::CallArgument(Some(func_ty)) = category { + let (fn_did, substs) = match func_ty.kind() { + ty::FnDef(fn_did, substs) => (fn_did, substs), + _ => return, + }; + debug!(?fn_did, ?substs); + + // Only suggest this on function calls, not closures + let ty = tcx.type_of(fn_did); + debug!("ty: {:?}, ty.kind: {:?}", ty, ty.kind()); + if let ty::Closure(_, _) = ty.kind() { + return; + } + + if let Ok(Some(instance)) = ty::Instance::resolve( + tcx, + self.param_env, + *fn_did, + self.infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(substs), + ) { + instance + } else { + return; + } + } else { + return; + }; + + let param = match find_param_with_region(tcx, f, o) { + Some(param) => param, + None => return, + }; + debug!(?param); + + let mut visitor = TraitObjectVisitor(FxHashSet::default()); + visitor.visit_ty(param.param_ty); + + let Some((ident, self_ty)) = + self.get_impl_ident_and_self_ty_from_trait(instance.def_id(), &visitor.0) else {return}; + + self.suggest_constrain_dyn_trait_in_impl(diag, &visitor.0, ident, self_ty); + } + + #[instrument(skip(self, err), level = "debug")] + fn suggest_constrain_dyn_trait_in_impl( + &self, + err: &mut Diagnostic, + found_dids: &FxHashSet<DefId>, + ident: Ident, + self_ty: &hir::Ty<'_>, + ) -> bool { + debug!("err: {:#?}", err); + let mut suggested = false; + for found_did in found_dids { + let mut traits = vec![]; + let mut hir_v = HirTraitObjectVisitor(&mut traits, *found_did); + hir_v.visit_ty(&self_ty); + debug!("trait spans found: {:?}", traits); + for span in &traits { + let mut multi_span: MultiSpan = vec![*span].into(); + multi_span.push_span_label( + *span, + "this has an implicit `'static` lifetime requirement".to_string(), + ); + multi_span.push_span_label( + ident.span, + "calling this method introduces the `impl`'s 'static` requirement".to_string(), + ); + err.span_note(multi_span, "the used `impl` has a `'static` requirement"); + err.span_suggestion_verbose( + span.shrink_to_hi(), + "consider relaxing the implicit `'static` requirement", + " + '_".to_string(), + Applicability::MaybeIncorrect, + ); + suggested = true; + } + } + suggested + } + fn suggest_adding_lifetime_params( &self, diag: &mut Diagnostic, diff --git a/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/region_infer/mod.rs b/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/region_infer/mod.rs index dc6337c54ed..2c460bcb72d 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/region_infer/mod.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/region_infer/mod.rs @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ pub struct RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> { /// Map closure bounds to a `Span` that should be used for error reporting. closure_bounds_mapping: - FxHashMap<Location, FxHashMap<(RegionVid, RegionVid), (ConstraintCategory, Span)>>, + FxHashMap<Location, FxHashMap<(RegionVid, RegionVid), (ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, Span)>>, /// Map universe indexes to information on why we created it. universe_causes: FxHashMap<ty::UniverseIndex, UniverseInfo<'tcx>>, @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> { member_constraints_in: MemberConstraintSet<'tcx, RegionVid>, closure_bounds_mapping: FxHashMap< Location, - FxHashMap<(RegionVid, RegionVid), (ConstraintCategory, Span)>, + FxHashMap<(RegionVid, RegionVid), (ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, Span)>, >, universe_causes: FxHashMap<ty::UniverseIndex, UniverseInfo<'tcx>>, type_tests: Vec<TypeTest<'tcx>>, @@ -1772,7 +1772,7 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> { fr1: RegionVid, fr1_origin: NllRegionVariableOrigin, fr2: RegionVid, - ) -> (ConstraintCategory, ObligationCause<'tcx>) { + ) -> (ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, ObligationCause<'tcx>) { let BlameConstraint { category, cause, .. } = self.best_blame_constraint(body, fr1, fr1_origin, |r| { self.provides_universal_region(r, fr1, fr2) @@ -2270,7 +2270,7 @@ impl<'tcx> ClosureRegionRequirementsExt<'tcx> for ClosureRegionRequirements<'tcx #[derive(Clone, Debug)] pub struct BlameConstraint<'tcx> { - pub category: ConstraintCategory, + pub category: ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, pub from_closure: bool, pub cause: ObligationCause<'tcx>, pub variance_info: ty::VarianceDiagInfo<'tcx>, diff --git a/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/type_check/canonical.rs b/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/type_check/canonical.rs index 3856b7f4a4b..55c0bf05b48 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/type_check/canonical.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/type_check/canonical.rs @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { pub(super) fn fully_perform_op<R, Op>( &mut self, locations: Locations, - category: ConstraintCategory, + category: ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, op: Op, ) -> Fallible<R> where @@ -83,11 +83,12 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { instantiated } + #[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug")] pub(super) fn prove_trait_ref( &mut self, trait_ref: ty::TraitRef<'tcx>, locations: Locations, - category: ConstraintCategory, + category: ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, ) { self.prove_predicates( Some(ty::Binder::dummy(ty::PredicateKind::Trait(ty::TraitPredicate { @@ -113,6 +114,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { .into_iter() .zip(instantiated_predicates.spans.into_iter()) { + debug!(?predicate); let predicate = self.normalize(predicate, locations); self.prove_predicate(predicate, locations, ConstraintCategory::Predicate(span)); } @@ -122,7 +124,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { &mut self, predicates: impl IntoIterator<Item = impl ToPredicate<'tcx>>, locations: Locations, - category: ConstraintCategory, + category: ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, ) { for predicate in predicates { let predicate = predicate.to_predicate(self.tcx()); @@ -137,7 +139,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { &mut self, predicate: ty::Predicate<'tcx>, locations: Locations, - category: ConstraintCategory, + category: ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, ) { let param_env = self.param_env; self.fully_perform_op( diff --git a/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/type_check/constraint_conversion.rs b/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/type_check/constraint_conversion.rs index f11a94d7ddd..3c9e3870aea 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/type_check/constraint_conversion.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/type_check/constraint_conversion.rs @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ pub(crate) struct ConstraintConversion<'a, 'tcx> { param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>, locations: Locations, span: Span, - category: ConstraintCategory, + category: ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, constraints: &'a mut MirTypeckRegionConstraints<'tcx>, } @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ConstraintConversion<'a, 'tcx> { param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>, locations: Locations, span: Span, - category: ConstraintCategory, + category: ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, constraints: &'a mut MirTypeckRegionConstraints<'tcx>, ) -> Self { Self { diff --git a/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/type_check/mod.rs b/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/type_check/mod.rs index 34bc87b20c7..4a2b2942008 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/type_check/mod.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/type_check/mod.rs @@ -162,6 +162,8 @@ pub(crate) fn type_check<'mir, 'tcx>( &mut constraints, ); + debug!(?normalized_inputs_and_output); + for u in ty::UniverseIndex::ROOT..infcx.universe() { let info = UniverseInfo::other(); constraints.universe_causes.insert(u, info); @@ -185,6 +187,7 @@ pub(crate) fn type_check<'mir, 'tcx>( implicit_region_bound, &mut borrowck_context, |mut cx| { + debug!("inside extra closure of type_check_internal"); cx.equate_inputs_and_outputs(&body, universal_regions, &normalized_inputs_and_output); liveness::generate( &mut cx, @@ -257,6 +260,7 @@ fn type_check_internal<'a, 'tcx, R>( borrowck_context: &'a mut BorrowCheckContext<'a, 'tcx>, extra: impl FnOnce(TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx>) -> R, ) -> R { + debug!("body: {:#?}", body); let mut checker = TypeChecker::new( infcx, body, @@ -935,7 +939,7 @@ pub(crate) struct MirTypeckRegionConstraints<'tcx> { pub(crate) member_constraints: MemberConstraintSet<'tcx, RegionVid>, pub(crate) closure_bounds_mapping: - FxHashMap<Location, FxHashMap<(RegionVid, RegionVid), (ConstraintCategory, Span)>>, + FxHashMap<Location, FxHashMap<(RegionVid, RegionVid), (ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, Span)>>, pub(crate) universe_causes: FxHashMap<ty::UniverseIndex, UniverseInfo<'tcx>>, @@ -1125,7 +1129,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { fn push_region_constraints( &mut self, locations: Locations, - category: ConstraintCategory, + category: ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, data: &QueryRegionConstraints<'tcx>, ) { debug!("constraints generated: {:#?}", data); @@ -1150,7 +1154,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { sub: Ty<'tcx>, sup: Ty<'tcx>, locations: Locations, - category: ConstraintCategory, + category: ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, ) -> Fallible<()> { // Use this order of parameters because the sup type is usually the // "expected" type in diagnostics. @@ -1163,7 +1167,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { expected: Ty<'tcx>, found: Ty<'tcx>, locations: Locations, - category: ConstraintCategory, + category: ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, ) -> Fallible<()> { self.relate_types(expected, ty::Variance::Invariant, found, locations, category) } @@ -1175,7 +1179,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { v: ty::Variance, user_ty: &UserTypeProjection, locations: Locations, - category: ConstraintCategory, + category: ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, ) -> Fallible<()> { let annotated_type = self.user_type_annotations[user_ty.base].inferred_ty; let mut curr_projected_ty = PlaceTy::from_ty(annotated_type); @@ -1212,6 +1216,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { #[instrument(skip(self, body, location), level = "debug")] fn check_stmt(&mut self, body: &Body<'tcx>, stmt: &Statement<'tcx>, location: Location) { let tcx = self.tcx(); + debug!("stmt kind: {:?}", stmt.kind); match stmt.kind { StatementKind::Assign(box (ref place, ref rv)) => { // Assignments to temporaries are not "interesting"; @@ -1251,9 +1256,13 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { ); let place_ty = place.ty(body, tcx).ty; + debug!(?place_ty); let place_ty = self.normalize(place_ty, location); + debug!("place_ty normalized: {:?}", place_ty); let rv_ty = rv.ty(body, tcx); + debug!(?rv_ty); let rv_ty = self.normalize(rv_ty, location); + debug!("normalized rv_ty: {:?}", rv_ty); if let Err(terr) = self.sub_types(rv_ty, place_ty, location.to_locations(), category) { @@ -1347,6 +1356,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { term_location: Location, ) { let tcx = self.tcx(); + debug!("terminator kind: {:?}", term.kind); match term.kind { TerminatorKind::Goto { .. } | TerminatorKind::Resume @@ -1404,7 +1414,12 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { // FIXME: check the values } TerminatorKind::Call { - ref func, ref args, destination, target, from_hir_call, .. + ref func, + ref args, + ref destination, + from_hir_call, + target, + .. } => { self.check_operand(func, term_location); for arg in args { @@ -1412,7 +1427,8 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { } let func_ty = func.ty(body, tcx); - debug!("check_terminator: call, func_ty={:?}", func_ty); + debug!("func_ty.kind: {:?}", func_ty.kind()); + let sig = match func_ty.kind() { ty::FnDef(..) | ty::FnPtr(_) => func_ty.fn_sig(tcx), _ => { @@ -1425,8 +1441,9 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { LateBoundRegionConversionTime::FnCall, sig, ); + debug!(?sig); let sig = self.normalize(sig, term_location); - self.check_call_dest(body, term, &sig, destination, target, term_location); + self.check_call_dest(body, term, &sig, *destination, target, term_location); self.prove_predicates( sig.inputs_and_output @@ -1585,11 +1602,20 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { if args.len() < sig.inputs().len() || (args.len() > sig.inputs().len() && !sig.c_variadic) { span_mirbug!(self, term, "call to {:?} with wrong # of args", sig); } + + let func_ty = if let TerminatorKind::Call { func, .. } = &term.kind { + Some(func.ty(body, self.infcx.tcx)) + } else { + None + }; + debug!(?func_ty); + for (n, (fn_arg, op_arg)) in iter::zip(sig.inputs(), args).enumerate() { let op_arg_ty = op_arg.ty(body, self.tcx()); + let op_arg_ty = self.normalize(op_arg_ty, term_location); let category = if from_hir_call { - ConstraintCategory::CallArgument + ConstraintCategory::CallArgument(func_ty) } else { ConstraintCategory::Boring }; @@ -1841,6 +1867,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { } } + #[instrument(skip(self, body), level = "debug")] fn check_rvalue(&mut self, body: &Body<'tcx>, rvalue: &Rvalue<'tcx>, location: Location) { let tcx = self.tcx(); diff --git a/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/type_check/relate_tys.rs b/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/type_check/relate_tys.rs index f98d2c3128c..c45850c6d84 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/type_check/relate_tys.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/type_check/relate_tys.rs @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { v: ty::Variance, b: Ty<'tcx>, locations: Locations, - category: ConstraintCategory, + category: ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, ) -> Fallible<()> { TypeRelating::new( self.infcx, @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ struct NllTypeRelatingDelegate<'me, 'bccx, 'tcx> { locations: Locations, /// What category do we assign the resulting `'a: 'b` relationships? - category: ConstraintCategory, + category: ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, /// Information so that error reporting knows what types we are relating /// when reporting a bound region error. @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ impl<'me, 'bccx, 'tcx> NllTypeRelatingDelegate<'me, 'bccx, 'tcx> { fn new( type_checker: &'me mut TypeChecker<'bccx, 'tcx>, locations: Locations, - category: ConstraintCategory, + category: ConstraintCategory<'tcx>, universe_info: UniverseInfo<'tcx>, ) -> Self { Self { type_checker, locations, category, universe_info } |
