diff options
| author | Guillaume Gomez <guillaume1.gomez@gmail.com> | 2025-06-27 15:04:52 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2025-06-27 15:04:52 +0200 |
| commit | 80f20c98f3bb38afc2747dcbec5fc57f6ebbef61 (patch) | |
| tree | 85c32e673a3de67216cc165e1c52762809f83fa8 /compiler/rustc_builtin_macros | |
| parent | aab2c20285e90395a597df270d8ae890814dfc4c (diff) | |
| parent | 1fd13fddba59ab686d5a01c6ad182a5bc109fe00 (diff) | |
| download | rust-80f20c98f3bb38afc2747dcbec5fc57f6ebbef61.tar.gz rust-80f20c98f3bb38afc2747dcbec5fc57f6ebbef61.zip | |
Rollup merge of #142671 - davidtwco:no-default-bounds-attr, r=lcnr
add #![rustc_no_implicit_bounds] Follow-up from rust-lang/rust#137944. Adds a new `rustc_attrs` attribute that stops rustc from adding any default bounds. Useful for tests where default bounds just add noise and make debugging harder. After reviewing all tests with `?Sized`, these tests seem like they could probably benefit from `#![rustc_no_implicit_bounds]`. - Skipping most of `tests/ui/unsized` as these seem to want to test `?Sized` - Skipping tests that used `Box<T>` because it's still bound by `T: MetaSized` - Skipping parsing or other tests that cared about `?Sized` syntactically - Skipping tests for `derive(CoercePointee)` because this appears to check that the pointee type is relaxed with `?Sized` explicitly r? `@lcnr`
Diffstat (limited to 'compiler/rustc_builtin_macros')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions