diff options
| author | Jubilee Young <workingjubilee@gmail.com> | 2025-05-08 14:30:33 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jubilee Young <workingjubilee@gmail.com> | 2025-05-17 06:42:46 +0200 |
| commit | 0c157b51d339fbfe51b6ef21acd4b21452c76f2c (patch) | |
| tree | 8ca1e01cad9d2a78a2dba64764f962a6c1842458 /compiler/rustc_codegen_gcc/libgccjit.version | |
| parent | c8bda740ea5c21af42fe4afa907f89805ab2b905 (diff) | |
| download | rust-0c157b51d339fbfe51b6ef21acd4b21452c76f2c.tar.gz rust-0c157b51d339fbfe51b6ef21acd4b21452c76f2c.zip | |
aarch64-linux: Default to FramePointer::NonLeaf
For aarch64-apple and aarch64-windows, platform docs state that code must use frame pointers correctly. This is because the AAPCS64 mandates that a platform specify its frame pointer conformance requirements: - Apple: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode/writing-arm64-code-for-apple-platforms#Respect-the-purpose-of-specific-CPU-registers - Windows: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/arm64-windows-abi-conventions?view=msvc-170#integer-registers - AAPCS64: https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/blob/4492d1570eb70c8fd146623e0db65b2d241f12e7/aapcs64/aapcs64.rst#the-frame-pointer Unwinding code either requires unwind tables or frame pointers, and on aarch64 the expectation is that one can use frame pointers for this. Most Linux targets represent a motley variety of possible distributions, so it is unclear who to defer to on conformance, other than perhaps Arm. In the absence of a specific edict for a given aarch64-linux target, Rust will assume aarch64-linux targets use non-leaf frame pointers. This reflects what compilers like clang do.
Diffstat (limited to 'compiler/rustc_codegen_gcc/libgccjit.version')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
