diff options
| author | Zalathar <Zalathar@users.noreply.github.com> | 2024-05-01 11:19:52 +1000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Zalathar <Zalathar@users.noreply.github.com> | 2024-05-14 17:05:00 +1000 |
| commit | c81be68fb49cf5798fe44cedd56cb91bdc61d011 (patch) | |
| tree | d6579f5f4db7c7219a6cac1b1bd04ffea9d4472c /compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/errors.rs | |
| parent | bfadc3a9b9cb4bbfacddf6e73adff23a3557852b (diff) | |
| download | rust-c81be68fb49cf5798fe44cedd56cb91bdc61d011.tar.gz rust-c81be68fb49cf5798fe44cedd56cb91bdc61d011.zip | |
coverage: Remove confusing comments from `CoverageKind`
These comments appear to be inspired by the similar comments on `CounterIncrement` and `ExpressionUsed`. But those comments refer to specific simplification steps performed during coverage codegen, and there is no corresponding step for the MC/DC coverage statements. If these statements do not survive optimization, they will simply not participate in code generation, just like any other statement.
Diffstat (limited to 'compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/errors.rs')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions