diff options
| author | Jubilee <46493976+workingjubilee@users.noreply.github.com> | 2024-06-06 21:10:11 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2024-06-06 21:10:11 -0700 |
| commit | b1ab8d59f48edbad630204279f3106f63448248a (patch) | |
| tree | 742beb5a69056e7108a8e5ed125c21f6c9ca4063 /compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src | |
| parent | 4c771d3117311b41c612985407d1f96bf57307d5 (diff) | |
| parent | 216424da32db1bf0d224b97ff3d0424622c97c4c (diff) | |
| download | rust-b1ab8d59f48edbad630204279f3106f63448248a.tar.gz rust-b1ab8d59f48edbad630204279f3106f63448248a.zip | |
Rollup merge of #126101 - lqd:revert-124099, r=wesleywiser
Revert "Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions" on nightly As discussed in [today's t-compiler meeting](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/238009-t-compiler.2Fmeetings/topic/.5Bweekly.5D.202024-06-06/near/443079505), this reverts PR #124099 to fix P-critical beta regressions #125199. r? ``@wesleywiser`` Opening as draft so that ``@wesleywiser`` and ``@apiraino,`` you can tell me whether you wanted: 1. a `beta-accepted` revert of #124099 on nightly (this PR)? That will need to be backported to beta (even though #126093 may be the last of those) 2. a revert of #124099 on beta? 3. all of the above? I also opened #126102, another draft PR to revert #124099 on beta, should you choose options 2 or 3.
Diffstat (limited to 'compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions