diff options
| author | Matthias Krüger <matthias.krueger@famsik.de> | 2023-12-12 06:52:49 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2023-12-12 06:52:49 +0100 |
| commit | dfc5ffacd32a795f5d6875c47ac0bf3c27bd1c8a (patch) | |
| tree | c48b53527a7d46c3770207069fff22168dab6d9a /compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src | |
| parent | 1ee83272fb7892957056f20c65b4da279cbcaf47 (diff) | |
| parent | 32e48fc36bcfc507d2e83fddc7f18d1c35605078 (diff) | |
| download | rust-dfc5ffacd32a795f5d6875c47ac0bf3c27bd1c8a.tar.gz rust-dfc5ffacd32a795f5d6875c47ac0bf3c27bd1c8a.zip | |
Rollup merge of #118756 - jyn514:colors, r=estebank
use bold magenta instead of bold white for highlighting according to a poll of gay people in my phone, purple is the most popular color to use for highlighting | color | percentage | | ---------- | ---------- | | bold white | 6% | | blue | 14% | | cyan | 26% | | purple | 37% | | magenta | 17% | unfortunately, purple is not supported by 16-color terminals, which rustc apparently wants to support for some reason. until we require support for full 256-color terms (e.g. by doing the same feature detection as we currently do for urls), we can't use it. instead, i have collapsed the purple votes into magenta on the theory that they're close, and also because magenta is pretty. before:  after:  other colors for comparison: blue:  cyan:  purple:  magenta without bolding:  r? ``@estebank``
Diffstat (limited to 'compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
