diff options
| author | bors <bors@rust-lang.org> | 2024-09-21 13:48:14 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bors <bors@rust-lang.org> | 2024-09-21 13:48:14 +0000 |
| commit | 28364822410af31bba5c8adac19cbbfcb9b48717 (patch) | |
| tree | ac72426b9887c2e17f638f694fc07603da661d5f /compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src | |
| parent | f48c99a0041bb82a750b34cf2570e0e73d6d801c (diff) | |
| parent | aa28ee1718bca8d0761e4cfc881e164571ad6683 (diff) | |
| download | rust-28364822410af31bba5c8adac19cbbfcb9b48717.tar.gz rust-28364822410af31bba5c8adac19cbbfcb9b48717.zip | |
Auto merge of #129283 - saethlin:unreachable-allocas, r=scottmcm
Don't alloca for unused locals We already have a concept of mono-unreachable basic blocks; this is primarily useful for ensuring that we do not compile code under an `if false`. But since we never gave locals the same analysis, a large local only used under an `if false` will still have stack space allocated for it. There are 3 places we traverse MIR during monomorphization: Inside the collector, `non_ssa_locals`, and the walk to generate code. Unfortunately, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129283#issuecomment-2297925578 indicates that we cannot afford the expense of tracking reachable locals during the collector's traversal, so we do need at least two mono-reachable traversals. And of course caching is of no help here because the benchmarks that regress are incr-unchanged; they don't do any codegen. This fixes the second problem in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/129282, and brings us anther step toward `const if` at home.
Diffstat (limited to 'compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src')
| -rw-r--r-- | compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/analyze.rs | 25 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/mod.rs | 26 |
2 files changed, 31 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/analyze.rs b/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/analyze.rs index f13c46e8bef..25712095e76 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/analyze.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/analyze.rs @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ use crate::traits::*; pub(crate) fn non_ssa_locals<'a, 'tcx, Bx: BuilderMethods<'a, 'tcx>>( fx: &FunctionCx<'a, 'tcx, Bx>, + traversal_order: &[mir::BasicBlock], ) -> BitSet<mir::Local> { let mir = fx.mir; let dominators = mir.basic_blocks.dominators(); @@ -24,13 +25,7 @@ pub(crate) fn non_ssa_locals<'a, 'tcx, Bx: BuilderMethods<'a, 'tcx>>( .map(|decl| { let ty = fx.monomorphize(decl.ty); let layout = fx.cx.spanned_layout_of(ty, decl.source_info.span); - if layout.is_zst() { - LocalKind::ZST - } else if fx.cx.is_backend_immediate(layout) || fx.cx.is_backend_scalar_pair(layout) { - LocalKind::Unused - } else { - LocalKind::Memory - } + if layout.is_zst() { LocalKind::ZST } else { LocalKind::Unused } }) .collect(); @@ -44,7 +39,8 @@ pub(crate) fn non_ssa_locals<'a, 'tcx, Bx: BuilderMethods<'a, 'tcx>>( // If there exists a local definition that dominates all uses of that local, // the definition should be visited first. Traverse blocks in an order that // is a topological sort of dominance partial order. - for (bb, data) in traversal::reverse_postorder(mir) { + for bb in traversal_order.iter().copied() { + let data = &mir.basic_blocks[bb]; analyzer.visit_basic_block_data(bb, data); } @@ -77,11 +73,22 @@ struct LocalAnalyzer<'a, 'b, 'tcx, Bx: BuilderMethods<'b, 'tcx>> { impl<'a, 'b, 'tcx, Bx: BuilderMethods<'b, 'tcx>> LocalAnalyzer<'a, 'b, 'tcx, Bx> { fn define(&mut self, local: mir::Local, location: DefLocation) { + let fx = self.fx; let kind = &mut self.locals[local]; + let decl = &fx.mir.local_decls[local]; match *kind { LocalKind::ZST => {} LocalKind::Memory => {} - LocalKind::Unused => *kind = LocalKind::SSA(location), + LocalKind::Unused => { + let ty = fx.monomorphize(decl.ty); + let layout = fx.cx.spanned_layout_of(ty, decl.source_info.span); + *kind = + if fx.cx.is_backend_immediate(layout) || fx.cx.is_backend_scalar_pair(layout) { + LocalKind::SSA(location) + } else { + LocalKind::Memory + }; + } LocalKind::SSA(_) => *kind = LocalKind::Memory, } } diff --git a/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/mod.rs b/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/mod.rs index 61e9b9bd774..68fb5cb2206 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/mod.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/mod.rs @@ -218,7 +218,8 @@ pub fn codegen_mir<'a, 'tcx, Bx: BuilderMethods<'a, 'tcx>>( fx.per_local_var_debug_info = fx.compute_per_local_var_debug_info(&mut start_bx); - let memory_locals = analyze::non_ssa_locals(&fx); + let traversal_order = traversal::mono_reachable_reverse_postorder(mir, cx.tcx(), instance); + let memory_locals = analyze::non_ssa_locals(&fx, &traversal_order); // Allocate variable and temp allocas let local_values = { @@ -277,17 +278,20 @@ pub fn codegen_mir<'a, 'tcx, Bx: BuilderMethods<'a, 'tcx>>( // So drop the builder of `start_llbb` to avoid having two at the same time. drop(start_bx); - let reachable_blocks = traversal::mono_reachable_as_bitset(mir, cx.tcx(), instance); + let mut unreached_blocks = BitSet::new_filled(mir.basic_blocks.len()); + // Codegen the body of each reachable block using our reverse postorder list. + for bb in traversal_order { + fx.codegen_block(bb); + unreached_blocks.remove(bb); + } - // Codegen the body of each block using reverse postorder - for (bb, _) in traversal::reverse_postorder(mir) { - if reachable_blocks.contains(bb) { - fx.codegen_block(bb); - } else { - // We want to skip this block, because it's not reachable. But we still create - // the block so terminators in other blocks can reference it. - fx.codegen_block_as_unreachable(bb); - } + // FIXME: These empty unreachable blocks are *mostly* a waste. They are occasionally + // targets for a SwitchInt terminator, but the reimplementation of the mono-reachable + // simplification in SwitchInt lowering sometimes misses cases that + // mono_reachable_reverse_postorder manages to figure out. + // The solution is to do something like post-mono GVN. But for now we have this hack. + for bb in unreached_blocks.iter() { + fx.codegen_block_as_unreachable(bb); } } |
