diff options
| author | Matthias Krüger <matthias.krueger@famsik.de> | 2023-07-25 23:17:39 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Matthias Krüger <matthias.krueger@famsik.de> | 2023-07-25 23:20:28 +0200 |
| commit | c64ef5e070ee7ae7fb73de2bec06fb7498a9af83 (patch) | |
| tree | c07f2178069538d7ae7a7a1349ccf6627bdc840e /compiler/rustc_const_eval/src | |
| parent | 8327047b23dc1eb150fdfb42177939388661eb6d (diff) | |
| download | rust-c64ef5e070ee7ae7fb73de2bec06fb7498a9af83.tar.gz rust-c64ef5e070ee7ae7fb73de2bec06fb7498a9af83.zip | |
inline format!() args from rustc_codegen_llvm to the end (4)
r? @WaffleLapkin
Diffstat (limited to 'compiler/rustc_const_eval/src')
10 files changed, 52 insertions, 69 deletions
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/const_eval/eval_queries.rs b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/const_eval/eval_queries.rs index b21cb984de6..e31c68d33d2 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/const_eval/eval_queries.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/const_eval/eval_queries.rs @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ fn eval_body_using_ecx<'mir, 'tcx>( trace!( "eval_body_using_ecx: pushing stack frame for global: {}{}", with_no_trimmed_paths!(ecx.tcx.def_path_str(cid.instance.def_id())), - cid.promoted.map_or_else(String::new, |p| format!("::promoted[{:?}]", p)) + cid.promoted.map_or_else(String::new, |p| format!("::promoted[{p:?}]")) ); ecx.push_stack_frame( diff --git a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/const_eval/valtrees.rs b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/const_eval/valtrees.rs index b519bcdf4a3..693b2d5f283 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/const_eval/valtrees.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/const_eval/valtrees.rs @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ fn slice_branches<'tcx>( place: &MPlaceTy<'tcx>, num_nodes: &mut usize, ) -> ValTreeCreationResult<'tcx> { - let n = place.len(ecx).unwrap_or_else(|_| panic!("expected to use len of place {:?}", place)); + let n = place.len(ecx).unwrap_or_else(|_| panic!("expected to use len of place {place:?}")); let mut elems = Vec::with_capacity(n as usize); for i in 0..n { diff --git a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/eval_context.rs b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/eval_context.rs index 0e6125388a6..f014037f278 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/eval_context.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/eval_context.rs @@ -1016,7 +1016,7 @@ impl<'a, 'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> std::fmt::Debug match self.place { Place::Local { frame, local, offset } => { let mut allocs = Vec::new(); - write!(fmt, "{:?}", local)?; + write!(fmt, "{local:?}")?; if let Some(offset) = offset { write!(fmt, "+{:#x}", offset.bytes())?; } @@ -1035,7 +1035,7 @@ impl<'a, 'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> std::fmt::Debug fmt, " by {} ref {:?}:", match mplace.meta { - MemPlaceMeta::Meta(meta) => format!(" meta({:?})", meta), + MemPlaceMeta::Meta(meta) => format!(" meta({meta:?})"), MemPlaceMeta::None => String::new(), }, mplace.ptr, @@ -1043,13 +1043,13 @@ impl<'a, 'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> std::fmt::Debug allocs.extend(mplace.ptr.provenance.map(Provenance::get_alloc_id)); } LocalValue::Live(Operand::Immediate(Immediate::Scalar(val))) => { - write!(fmt, " {:?}", val)?; + write!(fmt, " {val:?}")?; if let Scalar::Ptr(ptr, _size) = val { allocs.push(ptr.provenance.get_alloc_id()); } } LocalValue::Live(Operand::Immediate(Immediate::ScalarPair(val1, val2))) => { - write!(fmt, " ({:?}, {:?})", val1, val2)?; + write!(fmt, " ({val1:?}, {val2:?})")?; if let Scalar::Ptr(ptr, _size) = val1 { allocs.push(ptr.provenance.get_alloc_id()); } @@ -1065,7 +1065,7 @@ impl<'a, 'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> std::fmt::Debug Some(alloc_id) => { write!(fmt, "by ref {:?}: {:?}", mplace.ptr, self.ecx.dump_alloc(alloc_id)) } - ptr => write!(fmt, " integral by ref: {:?}", ptr), + ptr => write!(fmt, " integral by ref: {ptr:?}"), }, } } diff --git a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/intrinsics.rs b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/intrinsics.rs index 3f697168280..91da7ea68bc 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/intrinsics.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/intrinsics.rs @@ -394,17 +394,14 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, M> { // For *all* intrinsics we first check `is_uninhabited` to give a more specific // error message. _ if layout.abi.is_uninhabited() => format!( - "aborted execution: attempted to instantiate uninhabited type `{}`", - ty + "aborted execution: attempted to instantiate uninhabited type `{ty}`" ), ValidityRequirement::Inhabited => bug!("handled earlier"), ValidityRequirement::Zero => format!( - "aborted execution: attempted to zero-initialize type `{}`, which is invalid", - ty + "aborted execution: attempted to zero-initialize type `{ty}`, which is invalid" ), ValidityRequirement::UninitMitigated0x01Fill => format!( - "aborted execution: attempted to leave type `{}` uninitialized, which is invalid", - ty + "aborted execution: attempted to leave type `{ty}` uninitialized, which is invalid" ), ValidityRequirement::Uninit => bug!("assert_uninit_valid doesn't exist"), }; @@ -420,9 +417,7 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, M> { assert_eq!(input_len, dest_len, "Return vector length must match input length"); assert!( index < dest_len, - "Index `{}` must be in bounds of vector with length {}", - index, - dest_len + "Index `{index}` must be in bounds of vector with length {dest_len}" ); for i in 0..dest_len { @@ -440,9 +435,7 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, M> { let (input, input_len) = self.operand_to_simd(&args[0])?; assert!( index < input_len, - "index `{}` must be in bounds of vector with length {}", - index, - input_len + "index `{index}` must be in bounds of vector with length {input_len}" ); self.copy_op( &self.project_index(&input, index)?.into(), diff --git a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/memory.rs b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/memory.rs index 7b44a20ef03..02d022a2252 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/memory.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/memory.rs @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ impl<T: fmt::Display> fmt::Display for MemoryKind<T> { match self { MemoryKind::Stack => write!(f, "stack variable"), MemoryKind::CallerLocation => write!(f, "caller location"), - MemoryKind::Machine(m) => write!(f, "{}", m), + MemoryKind::Machine(m) => write!(f, "{m}"), } } } @@ -907,7 +907,7 @@ impl<'a, 'mir, 'tcx, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> std::fmt::Debug for DumpAllocs<'a, match self.ecx.memory.alloc_map.get(id) { Some((kind, alloc)) => { // normal alloc - write!(fmt, " ({}, ", kind)?; + write!(fmt, " ({kind}, ")?; write_allocation_track_relocs( &mut *fmt, *self.ecx.tcx, diff --git a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/operator.rs b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/operator.rs index 49c3b152e1d..eb064578067 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/operator.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/operator.rs @@ -24,8 +24,7 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, M> { debug_assert_eq!( Ty::new_tup(self.tcx.tcx, &[ty, self.tcx.types.bool]), dest.layout.ty, - "type mismatch for result of {:?}", - op, + "type mismatch for result of {op:?}", ); // Write the result to `dest`. if let Abi::ScalarPair(..) = dest.layout.abi { @@ -56,7 +55,7 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, M> { dest: &PlaceTy<'tcx, M::Provenance>, ) -> InterpResult<'tcx> { let (val, _overflowed, ty) = self.overflowing_binary_op(op, left, right)?; - assert_eq!(ty, dest.layout.ty, "type mismatch for result of {:?}", op); + assert_eq!(ty, dest.layout.ty, "type mismatch for result of {op:?}"); self.write_scalar(val, dest) } } diff --git a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/step.rs b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/step.rs index 9182d23128f..af6ca47708b 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/step.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/step.rs @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, M> { // The operand always has the same type as the result. let val = self.read_immediate(&self.eval_operand(operand, Some(dest.layout))?)?; let val = self.unary_op(un_op, &val)?; - assert_eq!(val.layout, dest.layout, "layout mismatch for result of {:?}", un_op); + assert_eq!(val.layout, dest.layout, "layout mismatch for result of {un_op:?}"); self.write_immediate(*val, &dest)?; } diff --git a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/validity.rs b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/validity.rs index a82c98e7205..2141243cb0e 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/validity.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/validity.rs @@ -164,14 +164,14 @@ fn write_path(out: &mut String, path: &[PathElem]) { for elem in path.iter() { match elem { - Field(name) => write!(out, ".{}", name), + Field(name) => write!(out, ".{name}"), EnumTag => write!(out, ".<enum-tag>"), - Variant(name) => write!(out, ".<enum-variant({})>", name), + Variant(name) => write!(out, ".<enum-variant({name})>"), GeneratorTag => write!(out, ".<generator-tag>"), GeneratorState(idx) => write!(out, ".<generator-state({})>", idx.index()), - CapturedVar(name) => write!(out, ".<captured-var({})>", name), - TupleElem(idx) => write!(out, ".{}", idx), - ArrayElem(idx) => write!(out, "[{}]", idx), + CapturedVar(name) => write!(out, ".<captured-var({name})>"), + TupleElem(idx) => write!(out, ".{idx}"), + ArrayElem(idx) => write!(out, "[{idx}]"), // `.<deref>` does not match Rust syntax, but it is more readable for long paths -- and // some of the other items here also are not Rust syntax. Actually we can't // even use the usual syntax because we are just showing the projections, diff --git a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/transform/check_consts/ops.rs b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/transform/check_consts/ops.rs index 81337079af2..e785196c744 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/transform/check_consts/ops.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/transform/check_consts/ops.rs @@ -310,8 +310,7 @@ impl<'tcx> NonConstOp<'tcx> for FnCallNonConst<'tcx> { if let Some(feature) = feature && ccx.tcx.sess.is_nightly_build() { err.help(format!( - "add `#![feature({})]` to the crate attributes to enable", - feature, + "add `#![feature({feature})]` to the crate attributes to enable", )); } @@ -346,10 +345,7 @@ impl<'tcx> NonConstOp<'tcx> for FnCallUnstable { err.help("const-stable functions can only call other const-stable functions"); } else if ccx.tcx.sess.is_nightly_build() { if let Some(feature) = feature { - err.help(format!( - "add `#![feature({})]` to the crate attributes to enable", - feature - )); + err.help(format!("add `#![feature({feature})]` to the crate attributes to enable")); } } diff --git a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/transform/validate.rs b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/transform/validate.rs index 7b2bed302db..31effadd2c2 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/transform/validate.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/transform/validate.rs @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> CfgChecker<'a, 'tcx> { } } } else { - self.fail(location, format!("encountered jump to invalid basic block {:?}", bb)) + self.fail(location, format!("encountered jump to invalid basic block {bb:?}")) } } @@ -222,8 +222,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> CfgChecker<'a, 'tcx> { self.fail( Location { block: bb, statement_index: 0 }, format!( - "Cleanup control flow violation: Cycle involving edge {:?} -> {:?}", - bb, parent, + "Cleanup control flow violation: Cycle involving edge {bb:?} -> {parent:?}", ), ); break; @@ -257,7 +256,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for CfgChecker<'a, 'tcx> { if self.body.local_decls.get(local).is_none() { self.fail( location, - format!("local {:?} has no corresponding declaration in `body.local_decls`", local), + format!("local {local:?} has no corresponding declaration in `body.local_decls`"), ); } @@ -272,7 +271,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for CfgChecker<'a, 'tcx> { self.storage_liveness.seek_after_primary_effect(location); let locals_with_storage = self.storage_liveness.get(); if !locals_with_storage.contains(local) { - self.fail(location, format!("use of local {:?}, which has no storage here", local)); + self.fail(location, format!("use of local {local:?}, which has no storage here")); } } } @@ -323,7 +322,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for CfgChecker<'a, 'tcx> { // DropsLowered`. However, this causes ICEs with generation of drop shims, which // seem to fail to set their `MirPhase` correctly. if matches!(kind, RetagKind::Raw | RetagKind::TwoPhase) { - self.fail(location, format!("explicit `{:?}` is forbidden", kind)); + self.fail(location, format!("explicit `{kind:?}` is forbidden")); } } StatementKind::StorageLive(local) => { @@ -556,7 +555,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { let ty = place.ty(&self.body.local_decls, self.tcx).ty; if !ty.is_copy_modulo_regions(self.tcx, self.param_env) { - self.fail(location, format!("`Operand::Copy` with non-`Copy` type {}", ty)); + self.fail(location, format!("`Operand::Copy` with non-`Copy` type {ty}")); } } } @@ -575,7 +574,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { ProjectionElem::Index(index) => { let index_ty = self.body.local_decls[index].ty; if index_ty != self.tcx.types.usize { - self.fail(location, format!("bad index ({:?} != usize)", index_ty)) + self.fail(location, format!("bad index ({index_ty:?} != usize)")) } } ProjectionElem::Deref @@ -586,22 +585,21 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { if base_ty.is_box() { self.fail( location, - format!("{:?} dereferenced after ElaborateBoxDerefs", base_ty), + format!("{base_ty:?} dereferenced after ElaborateBoxDerefs"), ) } } ProjectionElem::Field(f, ty) => { let parent_ty = place_ref.ty(&self.body.local_decls, self.tcx); let fail_out_of_bounds = |this: &mut Self, location| { - this.fail(location, format!("Out of bounds field {:?} for {:?}", f, parent_ty)); + this.fail(location, format!("Out of bounds field {f:?} for {parent_ty:?}")); }; let check_equal = |this: &mut Self, location, f_ty| { if !this.mir_assign_valid_types(ty, f_ty) { this.fail( location, format!( - "Field projection `{:?}.{:?}` specified type `{:?}`, but actual type is `{:?}`", - place_ref, f, ty, f_ty + "Field projection `{place_ref:?}.{f:?}` specified type `{ty:?}`, but actual type is `{f_ty:?}`" ) ) } @@ -649,7 +647,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { let Some(layout) = gen_body.generator_layout() else { self.fail( location, - format!("No generator layout for {:?}", parent_ty), + format!("No generator layout for {parent_ty:?}"), ); return; }; @@ -662,7 +660,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { let Some(f_ty) = layout.field_tys.get(local) else { self.fail( location, - format!("Out of bounds local {:?} for {:?}", local, parent_ty), + format!("Out of bounds local {local:?} for {parent_ty:?}"), ); return; }; @@ -705,7 +703,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { if debuginfo.references != 0 && place.projection.last() == Some(&PlaceElem::Deref) { self.fail( START_BLOCK.start_location(), - format!("debuginfo {:?}, has both ref and deref", debuginfo), + format!("debuginfo {debuginfo:?}, has both ref and deref"), ); } } @@ -715,7 +713,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { if ty.is_union() || ty.is_enum() { self.fail( START_BLOCK.start_location(), - format!("invalid type {:?} for composite debuginfo", ty), + format!("invalid type {ty:?} for composite debuginfo"), ); } if f.projection.iter().any(|p| !matches!(p, PlaceElem::Field(..))) { @@ -742,7 +740,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { && cntxt != PlaceContext::NonUse(NonUseContext::VarDebugInfo) && place.projection[1..].contains(&ProjectionElem::Deref) { - self.fail(location, format!("{:?}, has deref at the wrong place", place)); + self.fail(location, format!("{place:?}, has deref at the wrong place")); } self.super_place(place, cntxt, location); @@ -802,7 +800,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { Offset => { check_kinds!(a, "Cannot offset non-pointer type {:?}", ty::RawPtr(..)); if b != self.tcx.types.isize && b != self.tcx.types.usize { - self.fail(location, format!("Cannot offset by non-isize type {:?}", b)); + self.fail(location, format!("Cannot offset by non-isize type {b:?}")); } } Eq | Lt | Le | Ne | Ge | Gt => { @@ -867,13 +865,12 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { self.fail( location, format!( - "Cannot perform checked arithmetic on unequal types {:?} and {:?}", - a, b + "Cannot perform checked arithmetic on unequal types {a:?} and {b:?}" ), ); } } - _ => self.fail(location, format!("There is no checked version of {:?}", op)), + _ => self.fail(location, format!("There is no checked version of {op:?}")), } } Rvalue::UnaryOp(op, operand) => { @@ -1078,7 +1075,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { if !ty.is_bool() { self.fail( location, - format!("`assume` argument must be `bool`, but got: `{}`", ty), + format!("`assume` argument must be `bool`, but got: `{ty}`"), ); } } @@ -1091,7 +1088,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { } else { self.fail( location, - format!("Expected src to be ptr in copy_nonoverlapping, got: {}", src_ty), + format!("Expected src to be ptr in copy_nonoverlapping, got: {src_ty}"), ); return; }; @@ -1101,19 +1098,19 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { } else { self.fail( location, - format!("Expected dst to be ptr in copy_nonoverlapping, got: {}", dst_ty), + format!("Expected dst to be ptr in copy_nonoverlapping, got: {dst_ty}"), ); return; }; // since CopyNonOverlapping is parametrized by 1 type, // we only need to check that they are equal and not keep an extra parameter. if !self.mir_assign_valid_types(op_src_ty, op_dst_ty) { - self.fail(location, format!("bad arg ({:?} != {:?})", op_src_ty, op_dst_ty)); + self.fail(location, format!("bad arg ({op_src_ty:?} != {op_dst_ty:?})")); } let op_cnt_ty = count.ty(&self.body.local_decls, self.tcx); if op_cnt_ty != self.tcx.types.usize { - self.fail(location, format!("bad arg ({:?} != usize)", op_cnt_ty)) + self.fail(location, format!("bad arg ({op_cnt_ty:?} != usize)")) } } StatementKind::SetDiscriminant { place, .. } => { @@ -1125,8 +1122,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { self.fail( location, format!( - "`SetDiscriminant` is only allowed on ADTs and generators, not {:?}", - pty + "`SetDiscriminant` is only allowed on ADTs and generators, not {pty:?}" ), ); } @@ -1141,7 +1137,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { // DropsLowered`. However, this causes ICEs with generation of drop shims, which // seem to fail to set their `MirPhase` correctly. if matches!(kind, RetagKind::Raw | RetagKind::TwoPhase) { - self.fail(location, format!("explicit `{:?}` is forbidden", kind)); + self.fail(location, format!("explicit `{kind:?}` is forbidden")); } } StatementKind::StorageLive(_) @@ -1174,7 +1170,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { if Scalar::<()>::try_from_uint(value, size).is_none() { self.fail( location, - format!("the value {:#x} is not a proper {:?}", value, switch_ty), + format!("the value {value:#x} is not a proper {switch_ty:?}"), ) } } @@ -1185,7 +1181,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { ty::FnPtr(..) | ty::FnDef(..) => {} _ => self.fail( location, - format!("encountered non-callable type {} in `Call` terminator", func_ty), + format!("encountered non-callable type {func_ty} in `Call` terminator"), ), } } @@ -1195,8 +1191,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> { self.fail( location, format!( - "encountered non-boolean condition of type {} in `Assert` terminator", - cond_ty + "encountered non-boolean condition of type {cond_ty} in `Assert` terminator" ), ); } |
