diff options
| author | bors <bors@rust-lang.org> | 2024-12-03 04:39:48 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bors <bors@rust-lang.org> | 2024-12-03 04:39:48 +0000 |
| commit | efdd9e802053caeb52103945df858e87f837e59a (patch) | |
| tree | ba16a8a78b5db2b43298849d14d711b20cc444b9 /compiler/rustc_const_eval | |
| parent | 41cbe3e4d1ef8de310fbbd77043082960def9446 (diff) | |
| parent | 01ff36a6b9e9134421c4e353ccbc904fdfe53be6 (diff) | |
Auto merge of #133321 - compiler-errors:const-checker, r=wesleywiser
Get rid of HIR const checker As far as I can tell, the HIR const checker was implemented in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/66170 because we were not able to issue useful const error messages in the MIR const checker. This seems to have changed in the last 5 years, probably due to work like #90532. I've tweaked the diagnostics slightly and think the error messages have gotten *better* in fact. Thus I think the HIR const checker has reached the end of its usefulness, and we can retire it. cc `@RalfJung`
Diffstat (limited to 'compiler/rustc_const_eval')
| -rw-r--r-- | compiler/rustc_const_eval/messages.ftl | 8 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/check_consts/ops.rs | 11 |
2 files changed, 9 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/messages.ftl b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/messages.ftl index f93f4d36e45..c31c94495d0 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/messages.ftl +++ b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/messages.ftl @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ const_eval_extern_type_field = `extern type` field does not have a known offset const_eval_fn_ptr_call = function pointers need an RFC before allowed to be called in {const_eval_const_context}s const_eval_for_loop_into_iter_non_const = - cannot convert `{$ty}` into an iterator in {const_eval_const_context}s + cannot use `for` loop on `{$ty}` in {const_eval_const_context}s const_eval_frame_note = {$times -> [0] {const_eval_frame_note_inner} @@ -324,11 +324,11 @@ const_eval_ptr_as_bytes_1 = this code performed an operation that depends on the underlying bytes representing a pointer const_eval_ptr_as_bytes_2 = the absolute address of a pointer is not known at compile-time, so such operations are not supported -const_eval_question_branch_non_const = - `?` cannot determine the branch of `{$ty}` in {const_eval_const_context}s +const_eval_question_branch_non_const = + `?` is not allowed on `{$ty}` in {const_eval_const_context}s const_eval_question_from_residual_non_const = - `?` cannot convert from residual of `{$ty}` in {const_eval_const_context}s + `?` is not allowed on `{$ty}` in {const_eval_const_context}s const_eval_range = in the range {$lo}..={$hi} const_eval_range_lower = greater or equal to {$lo} diff --git a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/check_consts/ops.rs b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/check_consts/ops.rs index ab81e60a33f..489bb54a6f9 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/check_consts/ops.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/check_consts/ops.rs @@ -180,8 +180,10 @@ impl<'tcx> NonConstOp<'tcx> for FnCallNonConst<'tcx> { }; } - let mut err = match kind { - CallDesugaringKind::ForLoopIntoIter => { + // Don't point at the trait if this is a desugaring... + // FIXME(const_trait_impl): we could perhaps do this for `Iterator`. + match kind { + CallDesugaringKind::ForLoopIntoIter | CallDesugaringKind::ForLoopNext => { error!(NonConstForLoopIntoIter) } CallDesugaringKind::QuestionBranch => { @@ -196,10 +198,7 @@ impl<'tcx> NonConstOp<'tcx> for FnCallNonConst<'tcx> { CallDesugaringKind::Await => { error!(NonConstAwait) } - }; - - diag_trait(&mut err, self_ty, kind.trait_def_id(tcx)); - err + } } CallKind::FnCall { fn_trait_id, self_ty } => { let note = match self_ty.kind() { |
