Replace `MaybeUninit::uninit_array()` with array repeat expression.

This is possible now that inline const blocks are stable; the idea was
even mentioned as an alternative when `uninit_array()` was added:
<https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/65580#issuecomment-544200681>

> if it’s stabilized soon enough maybe it’s not worth having a
> standard library method that will be replaceable with
> `let buffer = [MaybeUninit::<T>::uninit(); $N];`

Const array repetition and inline const blocks are now stable (in the
next release), so that circumstance has come to pass, and we no longer
have reason to want `uninit_array()` other than convenience. Therefore,
let’s evaluate the inconvenience by not using `uninit_array()` in
the standard library, before potentially deleting it entirely.

2 files changed, 1 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/compiler/rustc_data_structures/src/lib.rs b/compiler/rustc_data_structures/src/lib.rs
index 9781aae22eb..cddc67d1578 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_data_structures/src/lib.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_data_structures/src/lib.rs
@@ -27,7 +27,6 @@
 #![feature(lint_reasons)]
 #![feature(macro_metavar_expr)]
 #![feature(map_try_insert)]
-#![feature(maybe_uninit_uninit_array)]
 #![feature(min_specialization)]
 #![feature(negative_impls)]
 #![feature(never_type)]
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_data_structures/src/sip128.rs b/compiler/rustc_data_structures/src/sip128.rs
index 4c9acfe0f71..fed23df10dc 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_data_structures/src/sip128.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_data_structures/src/sip128.rs
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ impl SipHasher128 {
     pub fn new_with_keys(key0: u64, key1: u64) -> SipHasher128 {
         let mut hasher = SipHasher128 {
             nbuf: 0,
-            buf: MaybeUninit::uninit_array(),
+            buf: [MaybeUninit::uninit(); BUFFER_WITH_SPILL_CAPACITY],
             state: State {
                 v0: key0 ^ 0x736f6d6570736575,
                 // The XOR with 0xee is only done on 128-bit algorithm version.