diff options
| author | Matthias Krüger <matthias.krueger@famsik.de> | 2021-11-17 15:58:01 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2021-11-17 15:58:01 +0100 |
| commit | 904dba506640f290c182f5f6e717a82c6e5b8dae (patch) | |
| tree | 1a7dd7bd7b853cb4d629a64237b49d5f202d5f73 /compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp | |
| parent | ec84633b542a7c14e380c8fb77f20a84b12cb2fe (diff) | |
| parent | c15b55ace6ae247fa1ca0001d8840c974644a817 (diff) | |
| download | rust-904dba506640f290c182f5f6e717a82c6e5b8dae.tar.gz rust-904dba506640f290c182f5f6e717a82c6e5b8dae.zip | |
Rollup merge of #90772 - GuillaumeGomez:vec-retain-mut, r=joshtriplett
Add Vec::retain_mut This is to continue the discussion started in #83218. Original comment was: > Take 2 of #34265, since I needed this today. The reason I think why we should add `retain_mut` is for coherency and for discoverability. For example we have `chunks` and `chunks_mut` or `get` and `get_mut` or `iter` and `iter_mut`, etc. When looking for mutable `retain`, I would expect `retain_mut` to exist. It took me a while to find out about `drain_filter`. So even if it provides an API close to `drain_filter`, just for the discoverability, I think it's worth it. cc ``````@m-ou-se`````` ``````@jonas-schievink`````` ``````@Mark-Simulacrum``````
Diffstat (limited to 'compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions