Rollup merge of #105455 - lcnr:correct-reveal-in-validate, r=jackh726

use the correct `Reveal` during validation

supersedes #105454. Deals with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/105009#issuecomment-1342395333, not closing #105009 as the ICE may leak into beta

The issue was the following:
- we optimize the mir, using `Reveal::All`
- some optimization relies on the hidden type of an opaque type
- we then validate using `Reveal::UserFacing` again which is not able to observe the hidden type

r? `@jackh726`

1 files changed, 8 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/syntax.rs b/compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/syntax.rs
index 614e0d012b3..5ba053820e0 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/syntax.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/syntax.rs
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 use super::{BasicBlock, Constant, Field, Local, SwitchTargets, UserTypeProjection};
 
 use crate::mir::coverage::{CodeRegion, CoverageKind};
+use crate::traits::Reveal;
 use crate::ty::adjustment::PointerCast;
 use crate::ty::subst::SubstsRef;
 use crate::ty::{self, List, Ty};
@@ -100,6 +101,13 @@ impl MirPhase {
             MirPhase::Runtime(RuntimePhase::Optimized) => "runtime-optimized",
         }
     }
+
+    pub fn reveal(&self) -> Reveal {
+        match *self {
+            MirPhase::Built | MirPhase::Analysis(_) => Reveal::UserFacing,
+            MirPhase::Runtime(_) => Reveal::All,
+        }
+    }
 }
 
 /// See [`MirPhase::Analysis`].