diff options
| author | bors <bors@rust-lang.org> | 2024-04-29 11:54:49 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bors <bors@rust-lang.org> | 2024-04-29 11:54:49 +0000 |
| commit | 7a5867425959b4b5d69334fa6f02150dc2a5d128 (patch) | |
| tree | 7074df6418d7e361b71a600181cba27e7eb1f763 /compiler/rustc_mir_transform/src/coverage/mod.rs | |
| parent | 90846015cc99aa90290c1f4ee95c571fff6901ef (diff) | |
| parent | eb422d5c7e6adccf83533ddb5a9836f6575bcd35 (diff) | |
| download | rust-7a5867425959b4b5d69334fa6f02150dc2a5d128.tar.gz rust-7a5867425959b4b5d69334fa6f02150dc2a5d128.zip | |
Auto merge of #124255 - RenjiSann:renji/mcdc-nested-expressions, r=Zalathar
MCDC coverage: support nested decision coverage
#123409 provided the initial MCDC coverage implementation.
As referenced in #124144, it does not currently support "nested" decisions, like the following example :
```rust
fn nested_if_in_condition(a: bool, b: bool, c: bool) {
if a && if b || c { true } else { false } {
say("yes");
} else {
say("no");
}
}
```
Note that there is an if-expression (`if b || c ...`) embedded inside a boolean expression in the decision of an outer if-expression.
This PR proposes a workaround for this cases, by introducing a Decision context stack, and by handing several `temporary condition bitmaps` instead of just one.
When instrumenting boolean expressions, if the current node is a leaf condition (i.e. not a `||`/`&&` logical operator nor a `!` not operator), we insert a new decision context, such that if there are more boolean expressions inside the condition, they are handled as separate expressions.
On the codegen LLVM side, we allocate as many `temp_cond_bitmap`s as necessary to handle the maximum encountered decision depth.
Diffstat (limited to 'compiler/rustc_mir_transform/src/coverage/mod.rs')
| -rw-r--r-- | compiler/rustc_mir_transform/src/coverage/mod.rs | 46 |
1 files changed, 31 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_mir_transform/src/coverage/mod.rs b/compiler/rustc_mir_transform/src/coverage/mod.rs index 0b15c52c281..159c099fac5 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_mir_transform/src/coverage/mod.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_mir_transform/src/coverage/mod.rs @@ -102,12 +102,23 @@ fn instrument_function_for_coverage<'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, mir_body: &mut mir: inject_mcdc_statements(mir_body, &basic_coverage_blocks, &coverage_spans); + let mcdc_max_decision_depth = coverage_spans + .mappings + .iter() + .filter_map(|bcb_mapping| match bcb_mapping.kind { + BcbMappingKind::MCDCDecision { decision_depth, .. } => Some(decision_depth), + _ => None, + }) + .max() + .unwrap_or(0); + mir_body.function_coverage_info = Some(Box::new(FunctionCoverageInfo { function_source_hash: hir_info.function_source_hash, num_counters: coverage_counters.num_counters(), mcdc_bitmap_bytes: coverage_spans.test_vector_bitmap_bytes(), expressions: coverage_counters.into_expressions(), mappings, + mcdc_max_decision_depth, })); } @@ -145,16 +156,17 @@ fn create_mappings<'tcx>( |BcbMapping { kind: bcb_mapping_kind, span }| { let kind = match *bcb_mapping_kind { BcbMappingKind::Code(bcb) => MappingKind::Code(term_for_bcb(bcb)), - BcbMappingKind::MCDCBranch { true_bcb, false_bcb, condition_info: None } => { - MappingKind::Branch { - true_term: term_for_bcb(true_bcb), - false_term: term_for_bcb(false_bcb), - } - } + BcbMappingKind::MCDCBranch { + true_bcb, false_bcb, condition_info: None, .. + } => MappingKind::Branch { + true_term: term_for_bcb(true_bcb), + false_term: term_for_bcb(false_bcb), + }, BcbMappingKind::MCDCBranch { true_bcb, false_bcb, condition_info: Some(mcdc_params), + .. } => MappingKind::MCDCBranch { true_term: term_for_bcb(true_bcb), false_term: term_for_bcb(false_bcb), @@ -246,24 +258,28 @@ fn inject_mcdc_statements<'tcx>( } // Inject test vector update first because `inject_statement` always insert new statement at head. - for (end_bcbs, bitmap_idx) in + for (end_bcbs, bitmap_idx, decision_depth) in coverage_spans.mappings.iter().filter_map(|mapping| match &mapping.kind { - BcbMappingKind::MCDCDecision { end_bcbs, bitmap_idx, .. } => { - Some((end_bcbs, *bitmap_idx)) + BcbMappingKind::MCDCDecision { end_bcbs, bitmap_idx, decision_depth, .. } => { + Some((end_bcbs, *bitmap_idx, *decision_depth)) } _ => None, }) { for end in end_bcbs { let end_bb = basic_coverage_blocks[*end].leader_bb(); - inject_statement(mir_body, CoverageKind::TestVectorBitmapUpdate { bitmap_idx }, end_bb); + inject_statement( + mir_body, + CoverageKind::TestVectorBitmapUpdate { bitmap_idx, decision_depth }, + end_bb, + ); } } - for (true_bcb, false_bcb, condition_id) in + for (true_bcb, false_bcb, condition_id, decision_depth) in coverage_spans.mappings.iter().filter_map(|mapping| match mapping.kind { - BcbMappingKind::MCDCBranch { true_bcb, false_bcb, condition_info } => { - Some((true_bcb, false_bcb, condition_info?.condition_id)) + BcbMappingKind::MCDCBranch { true_bcb, false_bcb, condition_info, decision_depth } => { + Some((true_bcb, false_bcb, condition_info?.condition_id, decision_depth)) } _ => None, }) @@ -271,13 +287,13 @@ fn inject_mcdc_statements<'tcx>( let true_bb = basic_coverage_blocks[true_bcb].leader_bb(); inject_statement( mir_body, - CoverageKind::CondBitmapUpdate { id: condition_id, value: true }, + CoverageKind::CondBitmapUpdate { id: condition_id, value: true, decision_depth }, true_bb, ); let false_bb = basic_coverage_blocks[false_bcb].leader_bb(); inject_statement( mir_body, - CoverageKind::CondBitmapUpdate { id: condition_id, value: false }, + CoverageKind::CondBitmapUpdate { id: condition_id, value: false, decision_depth }, false_bb, ); } |
