Factor out StmtKind::MacCall fields into `MacCallStmt` struct

In PR #76130, I add a fourth field, which makes using a tuple variant
somewhat unwieldy.

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/stmt.rs b/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/stmt.rs
index ac067cb0eab..341590c622c 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/stmt.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/stmt.rs
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ use rustc_ast as ast;
 use rustc_ast::ptr::P;
 use rustc_ast::token::{self, TokenKind};
 use rustc_ast::util::classify;
-use rustc_ast::{AttrStyle, AttrVec, Attribute, MacCall, MacStmtStyle};
+use rustc_ast::{AttrStyle, AttrVec, Attribute, MacCall, MacCallStmt, MacStmtStyle};
 use rustc_ast::{Block, BlockCheckMode, Expr, ExprKind, Local, Stmt, StmtKind, DUMMY_NODE_ID};
 use rustc_errors::{Applicability, PResult};
 use rustc_span::source_map::{BytePos, Span};
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
 
         let kind = if delim == token::Brace || self.token == token::Semi || self.token == token::Eof
         {
-            StmtKind::MacCall(P((mac, style, attrs)))
+            StmtKind::MacCall(P(MacCallStmt { mac, style, attrs }))
         } else {
             // Since none of the above applied, this is an expression statement macro.
             let e = self.mk_expr(lo.to(hi), ExprKind::MacCall(mac), AttrVec::new());