Rollup merge of #114704 - bvanjoi:fix-114636, r=compiler-errors

parser: not insert dummy field in struct

Fixes #114636

This PR eliminates the dummy field, initially introduced in #113999, thereby enabling unrestricted use of `ident.unwrap()`. A side effect of this action is that we can only report the error of the first macro invocation field within the struct node.

An alternative solution might be giving a virtual name to the macro, but it appears more complex.(https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114636#issuecomment-1670228715). Furthermore, if you think https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114636#issuecomment-1670228715 is a better solution, feel free to close this PR.

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 13 deletions

diff --git a/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/item.rs b/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/item.rs
index 5db31c23478..233c7016417 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/item.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/item.rs
@@ -1851,21 +1851,11 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
         attrs: AttrVec,
     ) -> PResult<'a, FieldDef> {
         let name = self.parse_field_ident(adt_ty, lo)?;
-        // Parse the macro invocation and recover
         if self.token.kind == token::Not {
             if let Err(mut err) = self.unexpected::<FieldDef>() {
-                err.subdiagnostic(MacroExpandsToAdtField { adt_ty }).emit();
-                self.bump();
-                self.parse_delim_args()?;
-                return Ok(FieldDef {
-                    span: DUMMY_SP,
-                    ident: None,
-                    vis,
-                    id: DUMMY_NODE_ID,
-                    ty: self.mk_ty(DUMMY_SP, TyKind::Err),
-                    attrs,
-                    is_placeholder: false,
-                });
+                // Encounter the macro invocation
+                err.subdiagnostic(MacroExpandsToAdtField { adt_ty });
+                return Err(err);
             }
         }
         self.expect_field_ty_separator()?;