diff options
| author | Michael Goulet <michael@errs.io> | 2024-06-24 15:51:03 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2024-06-24 15:51:03 -0400 |
| commit | 9ce2a070b3fbb053644c8f0ae569957ae08034e4 (patch) | |
| tree | 93fefed36bcbce497e0b3e828186816f0cfd388e /compiler/rustc_parse/src | |
| parent | 49bdf460a22ee85e27b311f3cde099cfa592f865 (diff) | |
| parent | 1852141219b39b2a6bb13ad273c96371d58a41e0 (diff) | |
| download | rust-9ce2a070b3fbb053644c8f0ae569957ae08034e4.tar.gz rust-9ce2a070b3fbb053644c8f0ae569957ae08034e4.zip | |
Rollup merge of #126682 - Zalathar:coverage-attr, r=lcnr
coverage: Overhaul validation of the `#[coverage(..)]` attribute This PR makes sweeping changes to how the (currently-unstable) coverage attribute is validated: - Multiple coverage attributes on the same item/expression are now treated as an error. - The attribute must always be `#[coverage(off)]` or `#[coverage(on)]`, and the error messages for this are more consistent. - A trailing comma is still allowed after off/on, since that's part of the normal attribute syntax. - Some places that silently ignored a coverage attribute now produce an error instead. - These cases were all clearly bugs. - Some places that ignored a coverage attribute (with a warning) now produce an error instead. - These were originally added as lints, but I don't think it makes much sense to knowingly allow new attributes to be used in meaningless places. - Some of these errors might soon disappear, if it's easy to extend recursive coverage attributes to things like modules and impl blocks. --- One of the goals of this PR is to lay a more solid foundation for making the coverage attribute recursive, so that it applies to all nested functions/closures instead of just the one it is directly attached to. Fixes #126658. This PR incorporates #126659, which adds more tests for validation of the coverage attribute. `@rustbot` label +A-code-coverage
Diffstat (limited to 'compiler/rustc_parse/src')
| -rw-r--r-- | compiler/rustc_parse/src/validate_attr.rs | 13 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_parse/src/validate_attr.rs b/compiler/rustc_parse/src/validate_attr.rs index bcb1131cc19..3d5e6371f4c 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_parse/src/validate_attr.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_parse/src/validate_attr.rs @@ -4,8 +4,10 @@ use crate::{errors, parse_in}; use rustc_ast::token::Delimiter; use rustc_ast::tokenstream::DelimSpan; -use rustc_ast::MetaItemKind; -use rustc_ast::{self as ast, AttrArgs, AttrArgsEq, Attribute, DelimArgs, MetaItem, Safety}; +use rustc_ast::{ + self as ast, AttrArgs, AttrArgsEq, Attribute, DelimArgs, MetaItem, MetaItemKind, + NestedMetaItem, Safety, +}; use rustc_errors::{Applicability, FatalError, PResult}; use rustc_feature::{ AttributeSafety, AttributeTemplate, BuiltinAttribute, Features, BUILTIN_ATTRIBUTE_MAP, @@ -184,9 +186,13 @@ pub(super) fn check_cfg_attr_bad_delim(psess: &ParseSess, span: DelimSpan, delim /// Checks that the given meta-item is compatible with this `AttributeTemplate`. fn is_attr_template_compatible(template: &AttributeTemplate, meta: &ast::MetaItemKind) -> bool { + let is_one_allowed_subword = |items: &[NestedMetaItem]| match items { + [item] => item.is_word() && template.one_of.iter().any(|&word| item.has_name(word)), + _ => false, + }; match meta { MetaItemKind::Word => template.word, - MetaItemKind::List(..) => template.list.is_some(), + MetaItemKind::List(items) => template.list.is_some() || is_one_allowed_subword(items), MetaItemKind::NameValue(lit) if lit.kind.is_str() => template.name_value_str.is_some(), MetaItemKind::NameValue(..) => false, } @@ -230,6 +236,7 @@ fn emit_malformed_attribute( if let Some(descr) = template.list { suggestions.push(format!("#{inner}[{name}({descr})]")); } + suggestions.extend(template.one_of.iter().map(|&word| format!("#{inner}[{name}({word})]"))); if let Some(descr) = template.name_value_str { suggestions.push(format!("#{inner}[{name} = \"{descr}\"]")); } |
