Point at `const` definition when used instead of a binding in a `let` statement

After:

```
error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding
  --> $DIR/bad-pattern.rs:19:13
   |
LL |     const PAT: u32 = 0;
   |     -------------- missing patterns are not covered because `PAT` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable
...
LL |         let PAT = v1;
   |             ^^^
   |             |
   |             pattern `1_u32..=u32::MAX` not covered
   |             help: introduce a variable instead: `PAT_var`
   |
   = note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant
   = note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html
   = note: the matched value is of type `u32`
```

Before:

```
error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding
  --> $DIR/bad-pattern.rs:19:13
   |
LL |         let PAT = v1;
   |             ^^^
   |             |
   |             pattern `1_u32..=u32::MAX` not covered
   |             missing patterns are not covered because `PAT` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable
   |             help: introduce a variable instead: `PAT_var`
   |
   = note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant
   = note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html
   = note: the matched value is of type `u32`
```

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions