diff options
| author | bors <bors@rust-lang.org> | 2022-12-03 05:24:35 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bors <bors@rust-lang.org> | 2022-12-03 05:24:35 +0000 |
| commit | 24f2704e96c9d3a4f887d2d0a7d79ecffd79bd65 (patch) | |
| tree | 1488e15adc00715025273fac5f332f3a7c3c0aae /compiler | |
| parent | dd7a12593a5274dd812a7b8ab91a4ff29adb81a2 (diff) | |
| parent | d8f6cc3b63a84095d9fccd605b53851c5f12219e (diff) | |
Auto merge of #105196 - JohnTitor:rollup-8rxqnq6, r=JohnTitor
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #104903 (Use ocx.normalize in report_projection_error) - #105032 (improve doc of into_boxed_slice and impl From<Vec<T>> for Box<[T]>) - #105100 (Add missing intra-doc link) - #105181 (Don't add a note for implementing a trait if its inner type is erroneous) - #105182 (Rustdoc-Json: Don't inline foreign traits) - #105188 (Don't elide type information when printing E0308 with `-Zverbose`) - #105189 (rustdoc: clean up redundant CSS on `.rustdoc-toggle.hideme`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Diffstat (limited to 'compiler')
4 files changed, 71 insertions, 39 deletions
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/error_reporting/mod.rs b/compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/error_reporting/mod.rs index 6bd1df97c16..662136ca18d 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/error_reporting/mod.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/error_reporting/mod.rs @@ -1255,7 +1255,7 @@ impl<'tcx> TypeErrCtxt<'_, 'tcx> { let num_display_types = consts_offset - regions_len; for (i, (ta1, ta2)) in type_arguments.take(num_display_types).enumerate() { let i = i + regions_len; - if ta1 == ta2 { + if ta1 == ta2 && !self.tcx.sess.verbose() { values.0.push_normal("_"); values.1.push_normal("_"); } else { @@ -1271,7 +1271,7 @@ impl<'tcx> TypeErrCtxt<'_, 'tcx> { let const_arguments = sub1.consts().zip(sub2.consts()); for (i, (ca1, ca2)) in const_arguments.enumerate() { let i = i + consts_offset; - if ca1 == ca2 { + if ca1 == ca2 && !self.tcx.sess.verbose() { values.0.push_normal("_"); values.1.push_normal("_"); } else { @@ -1450,7 +1450,7 @@ impl<'tcx> TypeErrCtxt<'_, 'tcx> { (ty::FnPtr(sig1), ty::FnPtr(sig2)) => self.cmp_fn_sig(sig1, sig2), _ => { - if t1 == t2 { + if t1 == t2 && !self.tcx.sess.verbose() { // The two types are the same, elide and don't highlight. (DiagnosticStyledString::normal("_"), DiagnosticStyledString::normal("_")) } else { diff --git a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/engine.rs b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/engine.rs index 64d01ddb09a..c028e89e4ea 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/engine.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/engine.rs @@ -112,6 +112,24 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ObligationCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { self.register_infer_ok_obligations(infer_ok) } + /// Makes `expected <: actual`. + pub fn eq_exp<T>( + &self, + cause: &ObligationCause<'tcx>, + param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>, + a_is_expected: bool, + a: T, + b: T, + ) -> Result<(), TypeError<'tcx>> + where + T: ToTrace<'tcx>, + { + self.infcx + .at(cause, param_env) + .eq_exp(a_is_expected, a, b) + .map(|infer_ok| self.register_infer_ok_obligations(infer_ok)) + } + pub fn eq<T: ToTrace<'tcx>>( &self, cause: &ObligationCause<'tcx>, diff --git a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/error_reporting/mod.rs b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/error_reporting/mod.rs index 049b24b3997..84e951e8023 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/error_reporting/mod.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/error_reporting/mod.rs @@ -1577,32 +1577,26 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxtPrivExt<'tcx> for TypeErrCtxt<'_, 'tcx> { } self.probe(|_| { - let mut err = error.err; - let mut values = None; + let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new_in_snapshot(self); // try to find the mismatched types to report the error with. // // this can fail if the problem was higher-ranked, in which // cause I have no idea for a good error message. let bound_predicate = predicate.kind(); - if let ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::Clause::Projection(data)) = + let (values, err) = if let ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::Clause::Projection(data)) = bound_predicate.skip_binder() { - let mut selcx = SelectionContext::new(self); let data = self.replace_bound_vars_with_fresh_vars( obligation.cause.span, infer::LateBoundRegionConversionTime::HigherRankedType, bound_predicate.rebind(data), ); - let mut obligations = vec![]; - // FIXME(normalization): Change this to use `At::normalize` - let normalized_ty = super::normalize_projection_type( - &mut selcx, + let normalized_ty = ocx.normalize( + &obligation.cause, obligation.param_env, - data.projection_ty, - obligation.cause.clone(), - 0, - &mut obligations, + self.tcx + .mk_projection(data.projection_ty.item_def_id, data.projection_ty.substs), ); debug!(?obligation.cause, ?obligation.param_env); @@ -1618,19 +1612,34 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxtPrivExt<'tcx> for TypeErrCtxt<'_, 'tcx> { | ObligationCauseCode::ObjectCastObligation(..) | ObligationCauseCode::OpaqueType ); - if let Err(new_err) = self.at(&obligation.cause, obligation.param_env).eq_exp( + let expected_ty = data.term.ty().unwrap(); + + // constrain inference variables a bit more to nested obligations from normalize so + // we can have more helpful errors. + ocx.select_where_possible(); + + if let Err(new_err) = ocx.eq_exp( + &obligation.cause, + obligation.param_env, is_normalized_ty_expected, normalized_ty, - data.term, + expected_ty, ) { - values = Some((data, is_normalized_ty_expected, normalized_ty, data.term)); - err = new_err; + (Some((data, is_normalized_ty_expected, normalized_ty, expected_ty)), new_err) + } else { + (None, error.err) } - } + } else { + (None, error.err) + }; let msg = values .and_then(|(predicate, _, normalized_ty, expected_ty)| { - self.maybe_detailed_projection_msg(predicate, normalized_ty, expected_ty) + self.maybe_detailed_projection_msg( + predicate, + normalized_ty.into(), + expected_ty.into(), + ) }) .unwrap_or_else(|| format!("type mismatch resolving `{}`", predicate)); let mut diag = struct_span_err!(self.tcx.sess, obligation.cause.span, E0271, "{msg}"); @@ -1672,11 +1681,11 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxtPrivExt<'tcx> for TypeErrCtxt<'_, 'tcx> { &mut diag, &obligation.cause, secondary_span, - values.map(|(_, is_normalized_ty_expected, normalized_ty, term)| { + values.map(|(_, is_normalized_ty_expected, normalized_ty, expected_ty)| { infer::ValuePairs::Terms(ExpectedFound::new( is_normalized_ty_expected, - normalized_ty, - term, + normalized_ty.into(), + expected_ty.into(), )) }), err, diff --git a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/mod.rs b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/mod.rs index 515f3a34988..8835f2cc1b9 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/mod.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/mod.rs @@ -371,23 +371,28 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> { if !candidate_set.ambiguous && no_candidates_apply { let trait_ref = stack.obligation.predicate.skip_binder().trait_ref; - let self_ty = trait_ref.self_ty(); - let (trait_desc, self_desc) = with_no_trimmed_paths!({ - let trait_desc = trait_ref.print_only_trait_path().to_string(); - let self_desc = if self_ty.has_concrete_skeleton() { - Some(self_ty.to_string()) + if !trait_ref.references_error() { + let self_ty = trait_ref.self_ty(); + let (trait_desc, self_desc) = with_no_trimmed_paths!({ + let trait_desc = trait_ref.print_only_trait_path().to_string(); + let self_desc = if self_ty.has_concrete_skeleton() { + Some(self_ty.to_string()) + } else { + None + }; + (trait_desc, self_desc) + }); + let cause = if let Conflict::Upstream = conflict { + IntercrateAmbiguityCause::UpstreamCrateUpdate { + trait_desc, + self_desc, + } } else { - None + IntercrateAmbiguityCause::DownstreamCrate { trait_desc, self_desc } }; - (trait_desc, self_desc) - }); - let cause = if let Conflict::Upstream = conflict { - IntercrateAmbiguityCause::UpstreamCrateUpdate { trait_desc, self_desc } - } else { - IntercrateAmbiguityCause::DownstreamCrate { trait_desc, self_desc } - }; - debug!(?cause, "evaluate_stack: pushing cause"); - self.intercrate_ambiguity_causes.as_mut().unwrap().insert(cause); + debug!(?cause, "evaluate_stack: pushing cause"); + self.intercrate_ambiguity_causes.as_mut().unwrap().insert(cause); + } } } } |
