Rollup merge of #98499 - JulianKnodt:erase_lifetime, r=lcnr

Erase regions in New Abstract Consts

When an abstract const is constructed, we previously included lifetimes in the set of substitutes, so it was not able to unify two abstract consts if their lifetimes did not match but the values did, despite the values not depending on the lifetimes. This caused code that should have compiled to not compile.

Fixes #98452

r? ```@lcnr```

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/const_evaluatable.rs b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/const_evaluatable.rs
index 5d08ea99ac6..424eff2f621 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/const_evaluatable.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/const_evaluatable.rs
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ impl<'tcx> AbstractConst<'tcx> {
     ) -> Result<Option<AbstractConst<'tcx>>, ErrorGuaranteed> {
         let inner = tcx.thir_abstract_const_opt_const_arg(uv.def)?;
         debug!("AbstractConst::new({:?}) = {:?}", uv, inner);
-        Ok(inner.map(|inner| AbstractConst { inner, substs: uv.substs }))
+        Ok(inner.map(|inner| AbstractConst { inner, substs: tcx.erase_regions(uv.substs) }))
     }
 
     pub fn from_const(
@@ -416,6 +416,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> AbstractConstBuilder<'a, 'tcx> {
                     // `AbstractConst`s should not contain any promoteds as they require references which
                     // are not allowed.
                     assert_eq!(ct.promoted, None);
+                    assert_eq!(ct, self.tcx.erase_regions(ct));
                 }
             }
         }