De-tuple two `vtable_trait_first_method_offset` args.

Thus eliminating a `FIXME` comment.

2 files changed, 4 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/confirmation.rs b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/confirmation.rs
index 4fa2455c42d..3d9d12bbd94 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/confirmation.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/confirmation.rs
@@ -693,7 +693,8 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
 
         let vtable_base = vtable_trait_first_method_offset(
             tcx,
-            (unnormalized_upcast_trait_ref, ty::Binder::dummy(object_trait_ref)),
+            unnormalized_upcast_trait_ref,
+            ty::Binder::dummy(object_trait_ref),
         );
 
         Ok(ImplSource::Builtin(BuiltinImplSource::Object { vtable_base: vtable_base }, nested))
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/vtable.rs b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/vtable.rs
index 178f3c63ef7..3f1ba80acd3 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/vtable.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/vtable.rs
@@ -320,16 +320,11 @@ fn vtable_entries<'tcx>(
 }
 
 /// Find slot base for trait methods within vtable entries of another trait
-// FIXME(@lcnr): This isn't a query, so why does it take a tuple as its argument.
 pub(super) fn vtable_trait_first_method_offset<'tcx>(
     tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
-    key: (
-        ty::PolyTraitRef<'tcx>, // trait_to_be_found
-        ty::PolyTraitRef<'tcx>, // trait_owning_vtable
-    ),
+    trait_to_be_found: ty::PolyTraitRef<'tcx>,
+    trait_owning_vtable: ty::PolyTraitRef<'tcx>,
 ) -> usize {
-    let (trait_to_be_found, trait_owning_vtable) = key;
-
     // #90177
     let trait_to_be_found_erased = tcx.erase_regions(trait_to_be_found);