about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/library/std/src/sys/unix/stack_overflow.rs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMatthias Krüger <matthias.krueger@famsik.de>2022-02-08 06:47:32 +0100
committerGitHub <noreply@github.com>2022-02-08 06:47:32 +0100
commit6024426e86af6dbe3991901752d886e9d43efa2a (patch)
tree00a50a80ec652585efcc62c34a152c928c533c4a /library/std/src/sys/unix/stack_overflow.rs
parent1f841fc5fe4f7c6f6c73de93930c3ee38c5f814b (diff)
parentfe9271af22f4a24a3fb06336c2e38fa124158bc6 (diff)
downloadrust-6024426e86af6dbe3991901752d886e9d43efa2a.tar.gz
rust-6024426e86af6dbe3991901752d886e9d43efa2a.zip
Rollup merge of #92695 - Swatinem:cover-nested, r=wesleywiser
Add `#[no_coverage]` tests for nested functions

I was playing around a bit trying to figure out how `#[no_coverage]` behaves for nested functions and thought I might as well add this as a testcase.

The "nesting covered fn inside not covered fn" case looks pretty much as expected.

The "nesting not covered fn inside a covered fn" case however seems a bit counterintuitive.
Essentially the region of the outer function "covers" its whole lexical range. And the inner function does not generate any region at all. 🤷🏻‍♂️

r? `@richkadel`
Diffstat (limited to 'library/std/src/sys/unix/stack_overflow.rs')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions