Rollup merge of #128046 - GrigorenkoPV:90435, r=tgross35

Fix some `#[cfg_attr(not(doc), repr(..))]`

Now that #90435 seems to have been resolved.

2 files changed, 4 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/library/std/src/ffi/os_str.rs b/library/std/src/ffi/os_str.rs
index f9dba08da4c..0fb3964c9a9 100644
--- a/library/std/src/ffi/os_str.rs
+++ b/library/std/src/ffi/os_str.rs
@@ -115,10 +115,8 @@ impl crate::sealed::Sealed for OsString {}
 #[stable(feature = "rust1", since = "1.0.0")]
 // `OsStr::from_inner` current implementation relies
 // on `OsStr` being layout-compatible with `Slice`.
-// However, `OsStr` layout is considered an implementation detail and must not be relied upon. We
-// want `repr(transparent)` but we don't want it to show up in rustdoc, so we hide it under
-// `cfg(doc)`. This is an ad-hoc implementation of attribute privacy.
-#[cfg_attr(not(doc), repr(transparent))]
+// However, `OsStr` layout is considered an implementation detail and must not be relied upon.
+#[repr(transparent)]
 pub struct OsStr {
     inner: Slice,
 }
diff --git a/library/std/src/path.rs b/library/std/src/path.rs
index d5121a554bf..0cef862549c 100644
--- a/library/std/src/path.rs
+++ b/library/std/src/path.rs
@@ -2079,10 +2079,8 @@ impl AsRef<OsStr> for PathBuf {
 #[stable(feature = "rust1", since = "1.0.0")]
 // `Path::new` current implementation relies
 // on `Path` being layout-compatible with `OsStr`.
-// However, `Path` layout is considered an implementation detail and must not be relied upon. We
-// want `repr(transparent)` but we don't want it to show up in rustdoc, so we hide it under
-// `cfg(doc)`. This is an ad-hoc implementation of attribute privacy.
-#[cfg_attr(not(doc), repr(transparent))]
+// However, `Path` layout is considered an implementation detail and must not be relied upon.
+#[repr(transparent)]
 pub struct Path {
     inner: OsStr,
 }