Minor cleanups to custom discriminator code.

Mostly updates to the comments and docs from Pull Request #1537.

2 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/src/comp/middle/ty.rs b/src/comp/middle/ty.rs
index d44b0ee0072..478888c99c7 100644
--- a/src/comp/middle/ty.rs
+++ b/src/comp/middle/ty.rs
@@ -2636,8 +2636,8 @@ fn tag_variants(cx: ctxt, id: ast::def_id) -> @[variant_info] {
         @csearch::get_tag_variants(cx, id)
     } else {
         // FIXME: Now that the variants are run through the type checker (to
-        // check the disr_expr if one exists), this code should likely be
-        // moved there to avoid having to call eval_const_expr twice
+        // check the disr_expr if it exists), this code should likely be
+        // moved there to avoid having to call eval_const_expr twice.
         alt cx.items.get(id.node) {
           ast_map::node_item(@{node: ast::item_tag(variants, _), _}) {
             let disr_val = -1;
diff --git a/src/comp/middle/typeck.rs b/src/comp/middle/typeck.rs
index c7736056a50..423d32bd4f6 100644
--- a/src/comp/middle/typeck.rs
+++ b/src/comp/middle/typeck.rs
@@ -2488,8 +2488,8 @@ fn check_tag_variants(ccx: @crate_ctxt, _sp: span, vs: [ast::variant],
             demand::simple(fcx, e.span, declty, cty);
             // FIXME: issue #1417
             // Also, check_expr (from check_const pass) doesn't guarantee that
-            // the expression in an form that eval_const_expr, so we may still
-            // get an internal compiler error
+            // the expression in an form that eval_const_expr can handle, so
+            // we may still get an internal compiler error.
             alt syntax::ast_util::eval_const_expr(e) {
               syntax::ast_util::const_int(val) {
                 disr_val = val as int;