diff options
| author | Steve Klabnik <steve@steveklabnik.com> | 2014-10-09 15:17:22 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Steve Klabnik <steve@steveklabnik.com> | 2014-10-29 11:43:07 -0400 |
| commit | 7828c3dd2858d8f3a0448484d8093e22719dbda0 (patch) | |
| tree | 2d2b106b02526219463d877d480782027ffe1f3f /src/doc/guide-unsafe.md | |
| parent | 3bc545373df4c81ba223a8bece14cbc27eb85a4d (diff) | |
| download | rust-7828c3dd2858d8f3a0448484d8093e22719dbda0.tar.gz rust-7828c3dd2858d8f3a0448484d8093e22719dbda0.zip | |
Rename fail! to panic!
https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/221
The current terminology of "task failure" often causes problems when
writing or speaking about code. You often want to talk about the
possibility of an operation that returns a Result "failing", but cannot
because of the ambiguity with task failure. Instead, you have to speak
of "the failing case" or "when the operation does not succeed" or other
circumlocutions.
Likewise, we use a "Failure" header in rustdoc to describe when
operations may fail the task, but it would often be helpful to separate
out a section describing the "Err-producing" case.
We have been steadily moving away from task failure and toward Result as
an error-handling mechanism, so we should optimize our terminology
accordingly: Result-producing functions should be easy to describe.
To update your code, rename any call to `fail!` to `panic!` instead.
Assuming you have not created your own macro named `panic!`, this
will work on UNIX based systems:
grep -lZR 'fail!' . | xargs -0 -l sed -i -e 's/fail!/panic!/g'
You can of course also do this by hand.
[breaking-change]
Diffstat (limited to 'src/doc/guide-unsafe.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/doc/guide-unsafe.md | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/src/doc/guide-unsafe.md b/src/doc/guide-unsafe.md index 7756abc8020..cade043a793 100644 --- a/src/doc/guide-unsafe.md +++ b/src/doc/guide-unsafe.md @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ code: - implement the `Drop` for resource clean-up via a destructor, and use RAII (Resource Acquisition Is Initialization). This reduces the need for any manual memory management by users, and automatically ensures - that clean-up is always run, even when the task fails. + that clean-up is always run, even when the task panics. - ensure that any data stored behind a raw pointer is destroyed at the appropriate time. @@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ The second of these three functions, `eh_personality`, is used by the failure mechanisms of the compiler. This is often mapped to GCC's personality function (see the [libstd implementation](std/rt/unwind/index.html) for more -information), but crates which do not trigger failure can be assured +information), but crates which do not trigger a panic can be assured that this function is never called. The final function, `fail_fmt`, is also used by the failure mechanisms of the compiler. |
