Use simple 'for i in x' loops instead of 'while let Some(x) = x.next()' loops on iterators. (clippy::while_let_on_iterator)

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/src/librustc_mir/interpret/terminator.rs b/src/librustc_mir/interpret/terminator.rs
index 08d4ae34afb..ea8378574a3 100644
--- a/src/librustc_mir/interpret/terminator.rs
+++ b/src/librustc_mir/interpret/terminator.rs
@@ -311,9 +311,8 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, M> {
                         // taking into account the `spread_arg`.  If we could write
                         // this is a single iterator (that handles `spread_arg`), then
                         // `pass_argument` would be the loop body. It takes care to
-                        // not advance `caller_iter` for ZSTs.
-                        let mut locals_iter = body.args_iter();
-                        while let Some(local) = locals_iter.next() {
+                        // not advance `caller_iter` for ZSTs
+                        for local in body.args_iter() {
                             let dest = self.eval_place(&mir::Place::from(local))?;
                             if Some(local) == body.spread_arg {
                                 // Must be a tuple