diff options
| author | bors <bors@rust-lang.org> | 2020-02-20 15:52:57 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bors <bors@rust-lang.org> | 2020-02-20 15:52:57 +0000 |
| commit | bfb96048b5946e8c695790ae66ca105cb78da60b (patch) | |
| tree | d296d6d28b4b62fc51b0caae381994090254c90d /src/librustc_mir | |
| parent | 93711d063b2e369d7095ddd4c76c33c886411730 (diff) | |
| parent | ddc25456c5945457ba86cb60994ce9872bd98edd (diff) | |
| download | rust-bfb96048b5946e8c695790ae66ca105cb78da60b.tar.gz rust-bfb96048b5946e8c695790ae66ca105cb78da60b.zip | |
Auto merge of #69145 - matthewjasper:mir-typeck-static-ty, r=nikomatsakis
Fix MIR typeck soundness holes * Check types of static items * Always check lifetime bounds of `Copy` impls r? @nikomatsakis closes #69114
Diffstat (limited to 'src/librustc_mir')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/librustc_mir/borrow_check/type_check/mod.rs | 70 |
1 files changed, 41 insertions, 29 deletions
diff --git a/src/librustc_mir/borrow_check/type_check/mod.rs b/src/librustc_mir/borrow_check/type_check/mod.rs index c92486213fd..f4e1bce462f 100644 --- a/src/librustc_mir/borrow_check/type_check/mod.rs +++ b/src/librustc_mir/borrow_check/type_check/mod.rs @@ -313,6 +313,7 @@ impl<'a, 'b, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for TypeVerifier<'a, 'b, 'tcx> { ); } } else { + let tcx = self.tcx(); if let ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(def_id, substs, promoted) = constant.literal.val { if let Some(promoted) = promoted { let check_err = |verifier: &mut TypeVerifier<'a, 'b, 'tcx>, @@ -362,10 +363,23 @@ impl<'a, 'b, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for TypeVerifier<'a, 'b, 'tcx> { ); } } + } else if let Some(static_def_id) = constant.check_static_ptr(tcx) { + let unnormalized_ty = tcx.type_of(static_def_id); + let locations = location.to_locations(); + let normalized_ty = self.cx.normalize(unnormalized_ty, locations); + let literal_ty = constant.literal.ty.builtin_deref(true).unwrap().ty; + + if let Err(terr) = self.cx.eq_types( + normalized_ty, + literal_ty, + locations, + ConstraintCategory::Boring, + ) { + span_mirbug!(self, constant, "bad static type {:?} ({:?})", constant, terr); + } } - if let ty::FnDef(def_id, substs) = constant.literal.ty.kind { - let tcx = self.tcx(); + if let ty::FnDef(def_id, substs) = constant.literal.ty.kind { let instantiated_predicates = tcx.predicates_of(def_id).instantiate(tcx, substs); self.cx.normalize_and_prove_instantiated_predicates( instantiated_predicates, @@ -470,33 +484,6 @@ impl<'a, 'b, 'tcx> TypeVerifier<'a, 'b, 'tcx> { let mut place_ty = PlaceTy::from_ty(self.body.local_decls[place.local].ty); - if place.projection.is_empty() { - if let PlaceContext::NonMutatingUse(NonMutatingUseContext::Copy) = context { - let tcx = self.tcx(); - let trait_ref = ty::TraitRef { - def_id: tcx.lang_items().copy_trait().unwrap(), - substs: tcx.mk_substs_trait(place_ty.ty, &[]), - }; - - // To have a `Copy` operand, the type `T` of the - // value must be `Copy`. Note that we prove that `T: Copy`, - // rather than using the `is_copy_modulo_regions` - // test. This is important because - // `is_copy_modulo_regions` ignores the resulting region - // obligations and assumes they pass. This can result in - // bounds from `Copy` impls being unsoundly ignored (e.g., - // #29149). Note that we decide to use `Copy` before knowing - // whether the bounds fully apply: in effect, the rule is - // that if a value of some type could implement `Copy`, then - // it must. - self.cx.prove_trait_ref( - trait_ref, - location.to_locations(), - ConstraintCategory::CopyBound, - ); - } - } - for elem in place.projection.iter() { if place_ty.variant_index.is_none() { if place_ty.ty.references_error() { @@ -507,6 +494,31 @@ impl<'a, 'b, 'tcx> TypeVerifier<'a, 'b, 'tcx> { place_ty = self.sanitize_projection(place_ty, elem, place, location) } + if let PlaceContext::NonMutatingUse(NonMutatingUseContext::Copy) = context { + let tcx = self.tcx(); + let trait_ref = ty::TraitRef { + def_id: tcx.lang_items().copy_trait().unwrap(), + substs: tcx.mk_substs_trait(place_ty.ty, &[]), + }; + + // To have a `Copy` operand, the type `T` of the + // value must be `Copy`. Note that we prove that `T: Copy`, + // rather than using the `is_copy_modulo_regions` + // test. This is important because + // `is_copy_modulo_regions` ignores the resulting region + // obligations and assumes they pass. This can result in + // bounds from `Copy` impls being unsoundly ignored (e.g., + // #29149). Note that we decide to use `Copy` before knowing + // whether the bounds fully apply: in effect, the rule is + // that if a value of some type could implement `Copy`, then + // it must. + self.cx.prove_trait_ref( + trait_ref, + location.to_locations(), + ConstraintCategory::CopyBound, + ); + } + place_ty } |
