diff options
| author | Mazdak Farrokhzad <twingoow@gmail.com> | 2020-03-26 03:21:27 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2020-03-26 03:21:27 +0100 |
| commit | 9fa4953aa440cb85d13d6cc2a8a532a7d674cfa3 (patch) | |
| tree | 0728045998cae94546f4f6b3164b73dbbcdec9d3 /src/librustc_parse/parser | |
| parent | b105ac40188131b76ef02667847973caf54fd532 (diff) | |
| parent | 4832f3fd5d471ec7a4bfe4a599d8a4378b6d248d (diff) | |
| download | rust-9fa4953aa440cb85d13d6cc2a8a532a7d674cfa3.tar.gz rust-9fa4953aa440cb85d13d6cc2a8a532a7d674cfa3.zip | |
Rollup merge of #69878 - estebank:chained-ops, r=Centril
Tweak chained operators diagnostic Use more selective spans Improve suggestion output Be more selective when displaying suggestions Silence some knock-down type errors r? @Centril
Diffstat (limited to 'src/librustc_parse/parser')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/librustc_parse/parser/diagnostics.rs | 155 |
1 files changed, 103 insertions, 52 deletions
diff --git a/src/librustc_parse/parser/diagnostics.rs b/src/librustc_parse/parser/diagnostics.rs index 87255386b9e..c4546dedfcd 100644 --- a/src/librustc_parse/parser/diagnostics.rs +++ b/src/librustc_parse/parser/diagnostics.rs @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ use rustc_span::symbol::kw; use rustc_span::{MultiSpan, Span, SpanSnippetError, DUMMY_SP}; use log::{debug, trace}; -use std::mem; const TURBOFISH: &str = "use `::<...>` instead of `<...>` to specify type arguments"; @@ -459,9 +458,28 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> { err: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'_>, inner_op: &Expr, outer_op: &Spanned<AssocOp>, - ) { + ) -> bool /* advanced the cursor */ { if let ExprKind::Binary(op, ref l1, ref r1) = inner_op.kind { - match (op.node, &outer_op.node) { + if let ExprKind::Field(_, ident) = l1.kind { + if ident.as_str().parse::<i32>().is_err() && !matches!(r1.kind, ExprKind::Lit(_)) { + // The parser has encountered `foo.bar<baz`, the likelihood of the turbofish + // suggestion being the only one to apply is high. + return false; + } + } + let mut enclose = |left: Span, right: Span| { + err.multipart_suggestion( + "parenthesize the comparison", + vec![ + (left.shrink_to_lo(), "(".to_string()), + (right.shrink_to_hi(), ")".to_string()), + ], + Applicability::MaybeIncorrect, + ); + }; + return match (op.node, &outer_op.node) { + // `x == y == z` + (BinOpKind::Eq, AssocOp::Equal) | // `x < y < z` and friends. (BinOpKind::Lt, AssocOp::Less) | (BinOpKind::Lt, AssocOp::LessEqual) | (BinOpKind::Le, AssocOp::LessEqual) | (BinOpKind::Le, AssocOp::Less) | @@ -472,35 +490,55 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> { self.span_to_snippet(e.span) .unwrap_or_else(|_| pprust::expr_to_string(&e)) }; - err.span_suggestion( - inner_op.span.to(outer_op.span), - "split the comparison into two...", - format!( - "{} {} {} && {} {}", - expr_to_str(&l1), - op.node.to_string(), - expr_to_str(&r1), - expr_to_str(&r1), - outer_op.node.to_ast_binop().unwrap().to_string(), - ), - Applicability::MaybeIncorrect, - ); - err.span_suggestion( - inner_op.span.to(outer_op.span), - "...or parenthesize one of the comparisons", - format!( - "({} {} {}) {}", - expr_to_str(&l1), - op.node.to_string(), - expr_to_str(&r1), - outer_op.node.to_ast_binop().unwrap().to_string(), - ), + err.span_suggestion_verbose( + inner_op.span.shrink_to_hi(), + "split the comparison into two", + format!(" && {}", expr_to_str(&r1)), Applicability::MaybeIncorrect, ); + false // Keep the current parse behavior, where the AST is `(x < y) < z`. } - _ => {} - } + // `x == y < z` + (BinOpKind::Eq, AssocOp::Less) | (BinOpKind::Eq, AssocOp::LessEqual) | + (BinOpKind::Eq, AssocOp::Greater) | (BinOpKind::Eq, AssocOp::GreaterEqual) => { + // Consume `z`/outer-op-rhs. + let snapshot = self.clone(); + match self.parse_expr() { + Ok(r2) => { + // We are sure that outer-op-rhs could be consumed, the suggestion is + // likely correct. + enclose(r1.span, r2.span); + true + } + Err(mut expr_err) => { + expr_err.cancel(); + *self = snapshot; + false + } + } + } + // `x > y == z` + (BinOpKind::Lt, AssocOp::Equal) | (BinOpKind::Le, AssocOp::Equal) | + (BinOpKind::Gt, AssocOp::Equal) | (BinOpKind::Ge, AssocOp::Equal) => { + let snapshot = self.clone(); + // At this point it is always valid to enclose the lhs in parentheses, no + // further checks are necessary. + match self.parse_expr() { + Ok(_) => { + enclose(l1.span, r1.span); + true + } + Err(mut expr_err) => { + expr_err.cancel(); + *self = snapshot; + false + } + } + } + _ => false, + }; } + false } /// Produces an error if comparison operators are chained (RFC #558). @@ -534,31 +572,26 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> { |this: &Self, span| Ok(Some(this.mk_expr(span, ExprKind::Err, AttrVec::new()))); match inner_op.kind { - ExprKind::Binary(op, _, _) if op.node.is_comparison() => { - // Respan to include both operators. - let op_span = op.span.to(self.prev_token.span); - let mut err = - self.struct_span_err(op_span, "comparison operators cannot be chained"); - - // If it looks like a genuine attempt to chain operators (as opposed to a - // misformatted turbofish, for instance), suggest a correct form. - self.attempt_chained_comparison_suggestion(&mut err, inner_op, outer_op); + ExprKind::Binary(op, ref l1, ref r1) if op.node.is_comparison() => { + let mut err = self.struct_span_err( + vec![op.span, self.prev_token.span], + "comparison operators cannot be chained", + ); let suggest = |err: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'_>| { err.span_suggestion_verbose( - op_span.shrink_to_lo(), + op.span.shrink_to_lo(), TURBOFISH, "::".to_string(), Applicability::MaybeIncorrect, ); }; - if op.node == BinOpKind::Lt && - outer_op.node == AssocOp::Less || // Include `<` to provide this recommendation - outer_op.node == AssocOp::Greater - // even in a case like the following: + // Include `<` to provide this recommendation even in a case like + // `Foo<Bar<Baz<Qux, ()>>>` + if op.node == BinOpKind::Lt && outer_op.node == AssocOp::Less + || outer_op.node == AssocOp::Greater { - // Foo<Bar<Baz<Qux, ()>>> if outer_op.node == AssocOp::Less { let snapshot = self.clone(); self.bump(); @@ -572,7 +605,7 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> { { // We don't have `foo< bar >(` or `foo< bar >::`, so we rewind the // parser and bail out. - mem::replace(self, snapshot.clone()); + *self = snapshot.clone(); } } return if token::ModSep == self.token.kind { @@ -597,7 +630,7 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> { expr_err.cancel(); // Not entirely sure now, but we bubble the error up with the // suggestion. - mem::replace(self, snapshot); + *self = snapshot; Err(err) } } @@ -617,15 +650,33 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> { } } } else { - // All we know is that this is `foo < bar >` and *nothing* else. Try to - // be helpful, but don't attempt to recover. - err.help(TURBOFISH); - err.help("or use `(...)` if you meant to specify fn arguments"); - // These cases cause too many knock-down errors, bail out (#61329). - Err(err) + if !matches!(l1.kind, ExprKind::Lit(_)) + && !matches!(r1.kind, ExprKind::Lit(_)) + { + // All we know is that this is `foo < bar >` and *nothing* else. Try to + // be helpful, but don't attempt to recover. + err.help(TURBOFISH); + err.help("or use `(...)` if you meant to specify fn arguments"); + } + + // If it looks like a genuine attempt to chain operators (as opposed to a + // misformatted turbofish, for instance), suggest a correct form. + if self.attempt_chained_comparison_suggestion(&mut err, inner_op, outer_op) + { + err.emit(); + mk_err_expr(self, inner_op.span.to(self.prev_token.span)) + } else { + // These cases cause too many knock-down errors, bail out (#61329). + Err(err) + } }; } + let recover = + self.attempt_chained_comparison_suggestion(&mut err, inner_op, outer_op); err.emit(); + if recover { + return mk_err_expr(self, inner_op.span.to(self.prev_token.span)); + } } _ => {} } @@ -643,7 +694,7 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> { if self.token.kind == token::Eof { // Not entirely sure that what we consumed were fn arguments, rollback. - mem::replace(self, snapshot); + *self = snapshot; Err(()) } else { // 99% certain that the suggestion is correct, continue parsing. |
