Auto merge of #23002 - pnkfelix:fsk-box-place-runway, r=nikomatsakis

Runway for RFC 809 (overloaded box/placement-in) by adding type annotations or explicit calls to `Box::new` where I found it necessary on PR #22086.

I have broken this up into more than one PR because the entire commit chain (see PR #22086) is long, widespread and unwieldy to rebase frequently.

To my knowledge this is not a breaking change.  Also, there is in principle nothing stopping someone from reverting some/all of these annotations, since without the rest of the commit chain in #22086, the associated code would continue to compile.

All I can do is ask: Try to discourage others from removing seemingly "unnecessary" uses of the `Box` type or the `Box::new()` function, until the rest of RFC 809 lands.

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/src/libstd/rt/unwind.rs b/src/libstd/rt/unwind.rs
index 4dda3ea8c99..ebb2a2e4827 100644
--- a/src/libstd/rt/unwind.rs
+++ b/src/libstd/rt/unwind.rs
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ fn rust_panic(cause: Box<Any + Send + 'static>) -> ! {
     rtdebug!("begin_unwind()");
 
     unsafe {
-        let exception = box Exception {
+        let exception: Box<_> = box Exception {
             uwe: uw::_Unwind_Exception {
                 exception_class: rust_exception_class(),
                 exception_cleanup: exception_cleanup,
@@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ pub fn begin_unwind_fmt(msg: fmt::Arguments, file_line: &(&'static str, uint)) -
 
     let mut s = String::new();
     let _ = write!(&mut s, "{}", msg);
-    begin_unwind_inner(box s, file_line)
+    begin_unwind_inner(Box::new(s), file_line)
 }
 
 /// This is the entry point of unwinding for panic!() and assert!().
@@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ pub fn begin_unwind<M: Any + Send>(msg: M, file_line: &(&'static str, uint)) ->
     // panicking.
 
     // see below for why we do the `Any` coercion here.
-    begin_unwind_inner(box msg, file_line)
+    begin_unwind_inner(Box::new(msg), file_line)
 }
 
 /// The core of the unwinding.