prefer `if let` to match with `None => {}` arm in some places

This is a spiritual succesor to #34268/8531d581, in which we replaced a
number of matches of None to the unit value with `if let` conditionals
where it was judged that this made for clearer/simpler code (as would be
recommended by Manishearth/rust-clippy's `single_match` lint). The same
rationale applies to matches of None to the empty block.

1 files changed, 8 insertions, 12 deletions

diff --git a/src/libsyntax/parse/parser.rs b/src/libsyntax/parse/parser.rs
index 20a54228d01..6fa95afd9fb 100644
--- a/src/libsyntax/parse/parser.rs
+++ b/src/libsyntax/parse/parser.rs
@@ -2752,9 +2752,8 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
             }
         };
 
-        match parse_kleene_op(self)? {
-            Some(kleene_op) => return Ok((None, kleene_op)),
-            None => {}
+        if let Some(kleene_op) = parse_kleene_op(self)? {
+            return Ok((None, kleene_op));
         }
 
         let separator = self.bump_and_get();
@@ -5691,15 +5690,12 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
             }
             _ => None
         };
-        match nt_item {
-            Some(mut item) => {
-                self.bump();
-                let mut attrs = attrs;
-                mem::swap(&mut item.attrs, &mut attrs);
-                item.attrs.extend(attrs);
-                return Ok(Some(P(item)));
-            }
-            None => {}
+        if let Some(mut item) = nt_item {
+            self.bump();
+            let mut attrs = attrs;
+            mem::swap(&mut item.attrs, &mut attrs);
+            item.attrs.extend(attrs);
+            return Ok(Some(P(item)));
         }
 
         let lo = self.span.lo;