diff options
| author | Felix S. Klock II <pnkfelix@pnkfx.org> | 2015-06-05 08:31:27 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Felix S. Klock II <pnkfelix@pnkfx.org> | 2015-07-22 15:33:59 +0200 |
| commit | 1829fa5199bae5a192c771807c532badce14be37 (patch) | |
| tree | 83580d10f443b4af71c5722756e68ff1ac7526e9 /src/rustllvm/RustWrapper.cpp | |
| parent | 25281b121ff809f35a6abd7d2d115995436c3319 (diff) | |
| download | rust-1829fa5199bae5a192c771807c532badce14be37.tar.gz rust-1829fa5199bae5a192c771807c532badce14be37.zip | |
Hack for "unsafety hygiene" -- `push_unsafe!` and `pop_unsafe!`.
Even after expansion, the generated expressions still track depth of such pushes (i.e. how often you have "pushed" without a corresponding "pop"), and we add a rule that in a context with a positive `push_unsafe!` depth, it is effectively an `unsafe` block context. (This way, we can inject code that uses `unsafe` features, but still contains within it a sub-expression that should inherit the outer safety checking setting, outside of the injected code.) This is a total hack; it not only needs a feature-gate, but probably should be feature-gated forever (if possible). ignore-pretty in test/run-pass/pushpop-unsafe-okay.rs
Diffstat (limited to 'src/rustllvm/RustWrapper.cpp')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
