about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/src/rustllvm/RustWrapper.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorErick Tryzelaar <erick.tryzelaar@gmail.com>2016-06-16 21:16:55 +0100
committerErick Tryzelaar <erick.tryzelaar@gmail.com>2016-06-16 21:16:55 +0100
commitba5cab1fe0a1cb6f3de5a338a8009b5b649a80c3 (patch)
tree9aa82a882ed6dffca69f0529a60f20bad6dbe1fa /src/rustllvm/RustWrapper.cpp
parent12b6345bc2d0cc02d81bc712682b3c77346acc15 (diff)
downloadrust-ba5cab1fe0a1cb6f3de5a338a8009b5b649a80c3.tar.gz
rust-ba5cab1fe0a1cb6f3de5a338a8009b5b649a80c3.zip
Revert using ? for try! in the libsyntax pretty printer
The use of ...?instead of try!(...) in libsyntax makes
extracting libsyntax into syntex quite painful since it's
not stable yet. This makes backports take a much longer time
and causes a lot of problems for the syntex dependencies. Even
if it was, it'd take a few release cycles until syntex would
be able to use it. Since it's not stable and that this feature
is just syntax sugar, it would be most helpful if we could remove
it.

cc #34311
Diffstat (limited to 'src/rustllvm/RustWrapper.cpp')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions