rollup merge of #19494: P1start/better-expected

As an example of what this changes, the following code:

```rust
let x: [int ..4];
```

Currently spits out ‘expected `]`, found `..`’. However, a comma would also be valid there, as would a number of other tokens. This change adjusts the parser to produce more accurate errors, so that that example now produces ‘expected one of `(`, `+`, `,`, `::`, or `]`, found `..`’.

(Thanks to cramer on IRC for pointing out this problem with diagnostics.)

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions