diff options
| author | bors <bors@rust-lang.org> | 2020-05-15 21:55:43 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bors <bors@rust-lang.org> | 2020-05-15 21:55:43 +0000 |
| commit | cac9ad02cf952f16bd8b00797f5bb1dbc30e692e (patch) | |
| tree | 3623294adebe49aacc1b12e634784c8c1f85c361 /src/test/codegen/integer-overflow.rs | |
| parent | e22ccf53322a1a9caeca955802e1f8f07c4c47a0 (diff) | |
| parent | 95399f8f941b89785c6e9d94e0bc32ff5d43ba06 (diff) | |
| download | rust-cac9ad02cf952f16bd8b00797f5bb1dbc30e692e.tar.gz rust-cac9ad02cf952f16bd8b00797f5bb1dbc30e692e.zip | |
Auto merge of #5599 - dtolnay:letif, r=flip1995
Downgrade useless_let_if_seq to nursery
I feel that this lint has the wrong balance of incorrect suggestions for a default-enabled lint.
The immediate code I faced was something like:
```rust
fn main() {
let mut good = do1();
if !do2() {
good = false;
}
if good {
println!("good");
}
}
fn do1() -> bool { println!("1"); false }
fn do2() -> bool { println!("2"); false }
```
On this code Clippy calls it unidiomatic and suggests the following diff, which has different behavior in a way that I don't necessarily want.
```diff
- let mut good = do1();
- if !do2() {
- good = false;
- }
+ let good = if !do2() {
+ false
+ } else {
+ do1()
+ };
```
On exploring issues filed about this lint, I have found that other users have also struggled with inappropriate suggestions (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/4124, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/3043, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/2918, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/2176) and suggestions that make the code worse (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/3769, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/2749). Overall I believe that this lint is still at nursery quality for now and should not be enabled.
---
changelog: Remove useless_let_if_seq from default set of enabled lints
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test/codegen/integer-overflow.rs')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
