Rollup merge of #41625 - nikomatsakis:incr-comp-dep-tracking-cell-mir, r=eddyb

rework the queries for the MIR pipeline

This PR refashions the MIR pipeline. There are a number of changes:

* We no longer have "MIR passes" and the pass manager is completely reworked. Unless we are doing the interprocedural optimization (meaning, right now, the inline pass), we will process a single MIR from beginning to finish in a completely on-demand fashion; i.e., when you request `optimized_mir(D)`, that will trigger the MIR for `D` to actually be built and optimized, but no other functions are built or touched.
* We no longer use `&'tcx RefCell<Mir<'tcx>>` as the result of queries, since that spoils the view of queries as "pure functions". To avoid however copying the MIR, we use a `&'tcx Steal<Mir<'tcx>>` -- this is something like a ref-cell, in that you can use `borrow()` to read it, but it has no `borrow_mut()`. Instead, it has `steal()`, which will take the contents and then panic if any further read attempt occurs.
* We now support `[multi]` queries, which can optionally yield not just one result but a sequence of (K, V) pairs. This is used for the inlining pass. If inlining is enabled, then when it is invoked on **any** def-id D, it will go and read the results for **all** def-ids and transform them, and then return the results for all of them at once. This isn't ideal, and we'll probably want to rework this further, but it seems ok for now (note that MIR inlining is not enabled by default).

**Tips for the reviewer:** The commits here are meant to build individually, but the path is a *bit* meandering. In some cases, for example, I introduce a trait in one commit, and then tweak it in a later commit as I actually try to put it to use. You may want to read the README in the final commit to get a sense of where the overall design is headed.

@eddyb I did not wind up adding support for queries that produce more than one *kind* of result. Instead, I decided to just insert judicious use of the `force()` command. In other words, we had talked about e.g. having a query that produced not only the MIR but also the `const_qualif` result for the MIR in one sweep. I realized you can also have the same effect by having a kind of meta-query that forces the const-qualif pass and then reads the result. See the README for a description. (We can still do these "multi-query results" later if we want, I'm not sure though if it is necessary.)

r? @eddyb

cc @michaelwoerister @matthewhammer @arielb1, who participated in the IRC discussion.

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions