Rename `tests/codegen` into `tests/codegen-llvm`

2 files changed, 0 insertions, 59 deletions

diff --git a/tests/codegen/debuginfo-proc-macro/auxiliary/macro_def.rs b/tests/codegen/debuginfo-proc-macro/auxiliary/macro_def.rs
deleted file mode 100644
index c0691b23275..00000000000
--- a/tests/codegen/debuginfo-proc-macro/auxiliary/macro_def.rs
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,7 +0,0 @@
-extern crate proc_macro;
-use proc_macro::*;
-
-#[proc_macro]
-pub fn square_twice(_item: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
-    "(square(env::vars().count() as i32), square(env::vars().count() as i32))".parse().unwrap()
-}
diff --git a/tests/codegen/debuginfo-proc-macro/mir_inlined_twice_var_locs.rs b/tests/codegen/debuginfo-proc-macro/mir_inlined_twice_var_locs.rs
deleted file mode 100644
index 7530689d574..00000000000
--- a/tests/codegen/debuginfo-proc-macro/mir_inlined_twice_var_locs.rs
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,52 +0,0 @@
-//@ compile-flags: -Cdebuginfo=2 -Copt-level=0 -Zmir-enable-passes=+Inline
-// MSVC is different because of the individual allocas.
-//@ ignore-msvc
-
-//@ proc-macro: macro_def.rs
-
-// Find the variable.
-// CHECK-DAG: ![[#var_dbg:]] = !DILocalVariable(name: "n",{{( arg: 1,)?}} scope: ![[#var_scope:]]
-
-// Find both dbg_declares. These will proceed the variable metadata, of course, so we're looking
-// backwards.
-// CHECK-DAG: dbg_declare(ptr %n.dbg.spill{{[0-9]}}, ![[#var_dbg]], !DIExpression(), ![[#var_loc2:]])
-// CHECK-DAG: dbg_declare(ptr %n.dbg.spill, ![[#var_dbg]], !DIExpression(), ![[#var_loc1:]])
-
-// Find the first location definition, looking forwards again.
-// CHECK: ![[#var_loc1]] = !DILocation
-// CHECK-SAME: scope: ![[#var_scope:]], inlinedAt: ![[#var_inlinedAt1:]]
-
-// Find the first location's inlinedAt
-// NB: If we fail here it's *probably* because we failed to produce two
-// different locations and ended up reusing an earlier one.
-// CHECK: ![[#var_inlinedAt1]] = !DILocation
-// CHECK-SAME: scope: ![[var_inlinedAt1_scope:]]
-
-// Find the second location definition, still looking forwards.
-// NB: If we failed to produce two different locations, the test will
-// definitely fail by this point (if it hasn't already) because we won't
-// be able to find the same line again.
-// CHECK: ![[#var_loc2]] = !DILocation
-// CHECK-SAME: scope: ![[#var_scope]], inlinedAt: ![[#var_inlinedAt2:]]
-
-// Find the second location's inlinedAt.
-// CHECK: ![[#var_inlinedAt2]] = !DILocation
-// CHECK-SAME: scope: ![[#var_inlinedAt2_scope:]]
-
-// Finally, check that a discriminator was emitted for the second scope.
-// FIXMEkhuey ideally we would check that *either* scope has a discriminator
-// but I don't know that it's possible to check that with FileCheck.
-// CHECK: ![[#var_inlinedAt2_scope]] = !DILexicalBlockFile
-// CHECK-SAME: discriminator: [[#]]
-extern crate macro_def;
-
-use std::env;
-
-fn square(n: i32) -> i32 {
-    n * n
-}
-
-fn main() {
-    let (z1, z2) = macro_def::square_twice!();
-    println!("{z1} == {z2}");
-}