about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/tests/rustdoc-js-std/parser-errors.js
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMatthias Krüger <matthias.krueger@famsik.de>2023-05-04 08:09:03 +0200
committerGitHub <noreply@github.com>2023-05-04 08:09:03 +0200
commit6fca1a925985105e4393bbca227f868ee2de5c96 (patch)
treea17338ec1a8a911d960a26804f7bd912ca9ba378 /tests/rustdoc-js-std/parser-errors.js
parent129195f57c02c8a8e4cfc4b766d4ff7a3a837882 (diff)
parentbd146c72ac2faf6bbf189ad92d06e0bcd6cc92fc (diff)
downloadrust-6fca1a925985105e4393bbca227f868ee2de5c96.tar.gz
rust-6fca1a925985105e4393bbca227f868ee2de5c96.zip
Rollup merge of #110859 - compiler-errors:no-negative-drop-impls, r=oli-obk
Explicitly reject negative and reservation drop impls

Fixes #110858

It doesn't really make sense for a type to have a `!Drop` impl. Or at least, I don't want us to implicitly assign a meaning to it by the way the compiler *currently* handles it (incompletely), and rather I would like to see a PR (or an RFC...) assign a meaning to `!Drop` if we actually wanted one for it.
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/rustdoc-js-std/parser-errors.js')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions