about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/tests
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorOli Scherer <github333195615777966@oli-obk.de>2025-07-11 08:37:09 +0000
committerOli Scherer <github333195615777966@oli-obk.de>2025-07-15 07:58:29 +0000
commitcb7d52f6430922b5ffd29073f6605b19b80e7f36 (patch)
treefdf2a27e0f7af1859fe8fc6085be439856cb171e /tests
parentb5230e53604f1227a087397e561e1cd2329f59b6 (diff)
downloadrust-cb7d52f6430922b5ffd29073f6605b19b80e7f36.tar.gz
rust-cb7d52f6430922b5ffd29073f6605b19b80e7f36.zip
constify some methods using `SliceIndex`
Diffstat (limited to 'tests')
-rw-r--r--tests/ui/consts/const-eval/ub-slice-get-unchecked.rs3
-rw-r--r--tests/ui/consts/const-eval/ub-slice-get-unchecked.stderr12
2 files changed, 8 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/ub-slice-get-unchecked.rs b/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/ub-slice-get-unchecked.rs
index e805ac01c9d..ad2b49e6049 100644
--- a/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/ub-slice-get-unchecked.rs
+++ b/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/ub-slice-get-unchecked.rs
@@ -1,9 +1,10 @@
-//@ known-bug: #110395
+#![feature(const_index, const_trait_impl)]
 
 const A: [(); 5] = [(), (), (), (), ()];
 
 // Since the indexing is on a ZST, the addresses are all fine,
 // but we should still catch the bad range.
 const B: &[()] = unsafe { A.get_unchecked(3..1) };
+//~^ ERROR: slice::get_unchecked requires that the range is within the slice
 
 fn main() {}
diff --git a/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/ub-slice-get-unchecked.stderr b/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/ub-slice-get-unchecked.stderr
index 6e428079afe..88ea310f19c 100644
--- a/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/ub-slice-get-unchecked.stderr
+++ b/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/ub-slice-get-unchecked.stderr
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
-error[E0015]: cannot call non-const method `core::slice::<impl [()]>::get_unchecked::<std::ops::Range<usize>>` in constants
-  --> $DIR/ub-slice-get-unchecked.rs:7:29
+error[E0080]: evaluation panicked: unsafe precondition(s) violated: slice::get_unchecked requires that the range is within the slice
+              
+              This indicates a bug in the program. This Undefined Behavior check is optional, and cannot be relied on for safety.
+  --> $DIR/ub-slice-get-unchecked.rs:7:27
    |
 LL | const B: &[()] = unsafe { A.get_unchecked(3..1) };
-   |                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-   |
-   = note: calls in constants are limited to constant functions, tuple structs and tuple variants
+   |                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ evaluation of `B` failed here
 
 error: aborting due to 1 previous error
 
-For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0015`.
+For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0080`.