1 files changed, 3 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/const_eval/eval_queries.rs b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/const_eval/eval_queries.rs
index 6d3a89c0a8a..c5412affafe 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/const_eval/eval_queries.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/const_eval/eval_queries.rs
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ use crate::interpret::{
 };
 
 use rustc_errors::ErrorReported;
+use rustc_hir as hir;
 use rustc_hir::def::DefKind;
 use rustc_middle::mir;
 use rustc_middle::mir::interpret::ErrorHandled;
@@ -215,6 +216,7 @@ pub fn eval_to_const_value_raw_provider<'tcx>(
     tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
     key: ty::ParamEnvAnd<'tcx, GlobalId<'tcx>>,
 ) -> ::rustc_middle::mir::interpret::EvalToConstValueResult<'tcx> {
+    assert!(key.param_env.constness() == hir::Constness::Const);
     // see comment in eval_to_allocation_raw_provider for what we're doing here
     if key.param_env.reveal() == Reveal::All {
         let mut key = key;
@@ -249,6 +251,7 @@ pub fn eval_to_allocation_raw_provider<'tcx>(
     tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
     key: ty::ParamEnvAnd<'tcx, GlobalId<'tcx>>,
 ) -> ::rustc_middle::mir::interpret::EvalToAllocationRawResult<'tcx> {
+    assert!(key.param_env.constness() == hir::Constness::Const);
     // Because the constant is computed twice (once per value of `Reveal`), we are at risk of
     // reporting the same error twice here. To resolve this, we check whether we can evaluate the
     // constant in the more restrictive `Reveal::UserFacing`, which most likely already was