1 files changed, 20 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/memory.rs b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/memory.rs
index 57bf867e389..69fceb02ff9 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/memory.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/memory.rs
@@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ impl<'tcx, M: Machine<'tcx>> InterpCx<'tcx, M> {
         // do this after `check_and_deref_ptr` to ensure some basic sanity has already been checked.
         if !self.memory.validation_in_progress.get() {
             if let Ok((alloc_id, ..)) = self.ptr_try_get_alloc_id(ptr, size_i64) {
-                M::before_alloc_read(self, alloc_id)?;
+                M::before_alloc_access(self.tcx, &self.machine, alloc_id)?;
             }
         }
 
@@ -821,6 +821,9 @@ impl<'tcx, M: Machine<'tcx>> InterpCx<'tcx, M> {
         if let Some((alloc_id, offset, prov, alloc, machine)) = ptr_and_alloc {
             let range = alloc_range(offset, size);
             if !validation_in_progress {
+                // For writes, it's okay to only call those when there actually is a non-zero
+                // amount of bytes to be written: a zero-sized write doesn't manifest anything.
+                M::before_alloc_access(tcx, machine, alloc_id)?;
                 M::before_memory_write(
                     tcx,
                     machine,
@@ -1396,6 +1399,14 @@ impl<'tcx, M: Machine<'tcx>> InterpCx<'tcx, M> {
         let src_parts = self.get_ptr_access(src, size)?;
         let dest_parts = self.get_ptr_access(dest, size * num_copies)?; // `Size` multiplication
 
+        // Similar to `get_ptr_alloc`, we need to call `before_alloc_access` even for zero-sized
+        // reads. However, just like in `get_ptr_alloc_mut`, the write part is okay to skip for
+        // zero-sized writes.
+        if let Ok((alloc_id, ..)) = self.ptr_try_get_alloc_id(src, size.bytes().try_into().unwrap())
+        {
+            M::before_alloc_access(tcx, &self.machine, alloc_id)?;
+        }
+
         // FIXME: we look up both allocations twice here, once before for the `check_ptr_access`
         // and once below to get the underlying `&[mut] Allocation`.
 
@@ -1408,12 +1419,9 @@ impl<'tcx, M: Machine<'tcx>> InterpCx<'tcx, M> {
         let src_range = alloc_range(src_offset, size);
         assert!(!self.memory.validation_in_progress.get(), "we can't be copying during validation");
 
-        // Trigger read hooks.
-        // For the overlapping case, it is crucial that we trigger the read hooks
+        // Trigger read hook.
+        // For the overlapping case, it is crucial that we trigger the read hook
         // before the write hook -- the aliasing model cares about the order.
-        if let Ok((alloc_id, ..)) = self.ptr_try_get_alloc_id(src, size.bytes() as i64) {
-            M::before_alloc_read(self, alloc_id)?;
-        }
         M::before_memory_read(
             tcx,
             &self.machine,
@@ -1438,16 +1446,18 @@ impl<'tcx, M: Machine<'tcx>> InterpCx<'tcx, M> {
         let provenance = src_alloc
             .provenance()
             .prepare_copy(src_range, dest_offset, num_copies, self)
-            .map_err(|e| e.to_interp_error(dest_alloc_id))?;
+            .map_err(|e| e.to_interp_error(src_alloc_id))?;
         // Prepare a copy of the initialization mask.
         let init = src_alloc.init_mask().prepare_copy(src_range);
 
-        // Destination alloc preparations and access hooks.
-        let (dest_alloc, extra) = self.get_alloc_raw_mut(dest_alloc_id)?;
+        // Destination alloc preparations...
+        let (dest_alloc, machine) = self.get_alloc_raw_mut(dest_alloc_id)?;
         let dest_range = alloc_range(dest_offset, size * num_copies);
+        // ...and access hooks.
+        M::before_alloc_access(tcx, machine, dest_alloc_id)?;
         M::before_memory_write(
             tcx,
-            extra,
+            machine,
             &mut dest_alloc.extra,
             dest,
             (dest_alloc_id, dest_prov),