5 files changed, 46 insertions, 36 deletions
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/check_consts/qualifs.rs b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/check_consts/qualifs.rs
index 9c99782d223..dfcd1969a73 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/check_consts/qualifs.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/check_consts/qualifs.rs
@@ -188,12 +188,14 @@ impl Qualif for NeedsNonConstDrop {
             ObligationCause::misc(cx.body.span, cx.def_id()),
             param_env,
             ty::Binder::dummy(ty::TraitRef::new(cx.tcx, destruct_def_id, [ty]))
-                .to_host_effect_clause(cx.tcx, match cx.const_kind() {
-                    rustc_hir::ConstContext::ConstFn => ty::BoundConstness::Maybe,
-                    rustc_hir::ConstContext::Static(_) | rustc_hir::ConstContext::Const { .. } => {
-                        ty::BoundConstness::Const
-                    }
-                }),
+                .to_host_effect_clause(
+                    cx.tcx,
+                    match cx.const_kind() {
+                        rustc_hir::ConstContext::ConstFn => ty::BoundConstness::Maybe,
+                        rustc_hir::ConstContext::Static(_)
+                        | rustc_hir::ConstContext::Const { .. } => ty::BoundConstness::Const,
+                    },
+                ),
         ));
         !ocx.select_all_or_error().is_empty()
     }
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/errors.rs b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/errors.rs
index a2635885098..8df9877cabc 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/errors.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/errors.rs
@@ -578,10 +578,13 @@ impl<'a> ReportErrorExt for UndefinedBehaviorInfo<'a> {
             }
             ShiftOverflow { intrinsic, shift_amount } => {
                 diag.arg("intrinsic", intrinsic);
-                diag.arg("shift_amount", match shift_amount {
-                    Either::Left(v) => v.to_string(),
-                    Either::Right(v) => v.to_string(),
-                });
+                diag.arg(
+                    "shift_amount",
+                    match shift_amount {
+                        Either::Left(v) => v.to_string(),
+                        Either::Right(v) => v.to_string(),
+                    },
+                );
             }
             BoundsCheckFailed { len, index } => {
                 diag.arg("len", len);
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/call.rs b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/call.rs
index e2e6e16d8a7..cdf706f3752 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/call.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/call.rs
@@ -381,10 +381,13 @@ impl<'tcx, M: Machine<'tcx>> InterpCx<'tcx, M> {
                 "caller ABI: {:#?}, args: {:#?}",
                 caller_fn_abi,
                 args.iter()
-                    .map(|arg| (arg.layout().ty, match arg {
-                        FnArg::Copy(op) => format!("copy({op:?})"),
-                        FnArg::InPlace(mplace) => format!("in-place({mplace:?})"),
-                    }))
+                    .map(|arg| (
+                        arg.layout().ty,
+                        match arg {
+                            FnArg::Copy(op) => format!("copy({op:?})"),
+                            FnArg::InPlace(mplace) => format!("in-place({mplace:?})"),
+                        }
+                    ))
                     .collect::<Vec<_>>()
             );
             trace!(
@@ -874,10 +877,13 @@ impl<'tcx, M: Machine<'tcx>> InterpCx<'tcx, M> {
         );
 
         // Check `unwinding`.
-        assert_eq!(unwinding, match self.frame().loc {
-            Left(loc) => self.body().basic_blocks[loc.block].is_cleanup,
-            Right(_) => true,
-        });
+        assert_eq!(
+            unwinding,
+            match self.frame().loc {
+                Left(loc) => self.body().basic_blocks[loc.block].is_cleanup,
+                Right(_) => true,
+            }
+        );
         if unwinding && self.frame_idx() == 0 {
             throw_ub_custom!(fluent::const_eval_unwind_past_top);
         }
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/intern.rs b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/intern.rs
index 0cbb3b157f3..e14cc1dad36 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/intern.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/intern.rs
@@ -102,11 +102,11 @@ fn intern_as_new_static<'tcx>(
     alloc_id: AllocId,
     alloc: ConstAllocation<'tcx>,
 ) {
-    let feed = tcx.create_def(static_id, sym::nested, DefKind::Static {
-        safety: hir::Safety::Safe,
-        mutability: alloc.0.mutability,
-        nested: true,
-    });
+    let feed = tcx.create_def(
+        static_id,
+        sym::nested,
+        DefKind::Static { safety: hir::Safety::Safe, mutability: alloc.0.mutability, nested: true },
+    );
     tcx.set_nested_alloc_id_static(alloc_id, feed.def_id());
 
     if tcx.is_thread_local_static(static_id.into()) {
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/validity.rs b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/validity.rs
index 8e544798742..0ac34f4633b 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/validity.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/validity.rs
@@ -812,10 +812,10 @@ impl<'rt, 'tcx, M: Machine<'tcx>> ValidityVisitor<'rt, 'tcx, M> {
                 if start == 1 && end == max_value {
                     // Only null is the niche. So make sure the ptr is NOT null.
                     if self.ecx.scalar_may_be_null(scalar)? {
-                        throw_validation_failure!(self.path, NullablePtrOutOfRange {
-                            range: valid_range,
-                            max_value
-                        })
+                        throw_validation_failure!(
+                            self.path,
+                            NullablePtrOutOfRange { range: valid_range, max_value }
+                        )
                     } else {
                         return interp_ok(());
                     }
@@ -825,10 +825,10 @@ impl<'rt, 'tcx, M: Machine<'tcx>> ValidityVisitor<'rt, 'tcx, M> {
                 } else {
                     // Conservatively, we reject, because the pointer *could* have a bad
                     // value.
-                    throw_validation_failure!(self.path, PtrOutOfRange {
-                        range: valid_range,
-                        max_value
-                    })
+                    throw_validation_failure!(
+                        self.path,
+                        PtrOutOfRange { range: valid_range, max_value }
+                    )
                 }
             }
         };
@@ -836,11 +836,10 @@ impl<'rt, 'tcx, M: Machine<'tcx>> ValidityVisitor<'rt, 'tcx, M> {
         if valid_range.contains(bits) {
             interp_ok(())
         } else {
-            throw_validation_failure!(self.path, OutOfRange {
-                value: format!("{bits}"),
-                range: valid_range,
-                max_value
-            })
+            throw_validation_failure!(
+                self.path,
+                OutOfRange { value: format!("{bits}"), range: valid_range, max_value }
+            )
         }
     }