2 files changed, 5 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_pattern_analysis/src/errors.rs b/compiler/rustc_pattern_analysis/src/errors.rs
index bdb6cf19eac..2dffdc9846c 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_pattern_analysis/src/errors.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_pattern_analysis/src/errors.rs
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-use rustc_errors::{AddToDiagnostic, Diagnostic, SubdiagnosticMessage};
+use rustc_errors::{AddToDiagnostic, Diagnostic, SubdiagnosticMessageOp};
 use rustc_macros::{LintDiagnostic, Subdiagnostic};
 use rustc_middle::thir::Pat;
 use rustc_middle::ty::Ty;
@@ -62,10 +62,7 @@ pub struct Overlap<'tcx> {
 }
 
 impl<'tcx> AddToDiagnostic for Overlap<'tcx> {
-    fn add_to_diagnostic_with<F>(self, diag: &mut Diagnostic, _: F)
-    where
-        F: Fn(&mut Diagnostic, SubdiagnosticMessage) -> SubdiagnosticMessage,
-    {
+    fn add_to_diagnostic_with<F: SubdiagnosticMessageOp>(self, diag: &mut Diagnostic, _: F) {
         let Overlap { span, range } = self;
 
         // FIXME(mejrs) unfortunately `#[derive(LintDiagnostic)]`
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_pattern_analysis/src/usefulness.rs b/compiler/rustc_pattern_analysis/src/usefulness.rs
index 576005b2c7f..80a807b4f27 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_pattern_analysis/src/usefulness.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_pattern_analysis/src/usefulness.rs
@@ -1520,11 +1520,9 @@ fn compute_exhaustiveness_and_usefulness<'a, 'p, Cx: TypeCx>(
         split_ctors.push(Constructor::Missing);
     }
 
-    // Decide what constructors to report.
-    let is_integers = matches!(ctors_for_ty, ConstructorSet::Integers { .. });
-    let always_report_all = place.is_scrutinee && !is_integers;
-    // Whether we should report "Enum::A and Enum::C are missing" or "_ is missing".
-    let report_individual_missing_ctors = always_report_all || !all_missing;
+    // Whether we should report "Enum::A and Enum::C are missing" or "_ is missing". At the top
+    // level we prefer to list all constructors.
+    let report_individual_missing_ctors = place.is_scrutinee || !all_missing;
     // Which constructors are considered missing. We ensure that `!missing_ctors.is_empty() =>
     // split_ctors.contains(Missing)`. The converse usually holds except when
     // `!place_validity.is_known_valid()`.