diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'compiler/rustc_trait_selection')
3 files changed, 46 insertions, 46 deletions
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/error_reporting/traits/fulfillment_errors.rs b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/error_reporting/traits/fulfillment_errors.rs index 20cef5e06a4..307c1af41cc 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/error_reporting/traits/fulfillment_errors.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/error_reporting/traits/fulfillment_errors.rs @@ -1808,24 +1808,6 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeErrCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { StringPart::highlighted("cargo tree".to_string()), StringPart::normal("` to explore your dependency tree".to_string()), ]); - - // FIXME: this is a giant hack for the benefit of this specific diagnostic. Because - // we're so nested in method calls before the error gets emitted, bubbling a single bit - // flag informing the top level caller to stop adding extra detail to the diagnostic, - // would actually be harder to follow. So we do something naughty here: we consume the - // diagnostic, emit it and leave in its place a "delayed bug" that will continue being - // modified but won't actually be printed to end users. This *is not ideal*, but allows - // us to reduce the verbosity of an error that is already quite verbose and increase its - // specificity. Below we modify the main message as well, in a way that *could* break if - // the implementation of Diagnostics change significantly, but that would be caught with - // a make test failure when this diagnostic is tested. - err.primary_message(format!( - "{} because the trait comes from a different crate version", - err.messages[0].0.as_str().unwrap(), - )); - let diag = err.clone(); - err.downgrade_to_delayed_bug(); - self.tcx.dcx().emit_diagnostic(diag); return true; } diff --git a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/coherence.rs b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/coherence.rs index a98871b2d60..d59f408b806 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/coherence.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/coherence.rs @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ use std::fmt::Debug; -use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxIndexSet; +use rustc_data_structures::fx::{FxHashSet, FxIndexSet}; use rustc_errors::{Diag, EmissionGuarantee}; use rustc_hir::def::DefKind; use rustc_hir::def_id::DefId; @@ -117,28 +117,39 @@ pub fn overlapping_impls( return None; } - let _overlap_with_bad_diagnostics = overlap( - tcx, - TrackAmbiguityCauses::No, - skip_leak_check, - impl1_def_id, - impl2_def_id, - overlap_mode, - )?; - - // In the case where we detect an error, run the check again, but - // this time tracking intercrate ambiguity causes for better - // diagnostics. (These take time and can lead to false errors.) - let overlap = overlap( - tcx, - TrackAmbiguityCauses::Yes, - skip_leak_check, - impl1_def_id, - impl2_def_id, - overlap_mode, - ) - .unwrap(); - Some(overlap) + if tcx.next_trait_solver_in_coherence() { + overlap( + tcx, + TrackAmbiguityCauses::Yes, + skip_leak_check, + impl1_def_id, + impl2_def_id, + overlap_mode, + ) + } else { + let _overlap_with_bad_diagnostics = overlap( + tcx, + TrackAmbiguityCauses::No, + skip_leak_check, + impl1_def_id, + impl2_def_id, + overlap_mode, + )?; + + // In the case where we detect an error, run the check again, but + // this time tracking intercrate ambiguity causes for better + // diagnostics. (These take time and can lead to false errors.) + let overlap = overlap( + tcx, + TrackAmbiguityCauses::Yes, + skip_leak_check, + impl1_def_id, + impl2_def_id, + overlap_mode, + ) + .unwrap(); + Some(overlap) + } } fn fresh_impl_header<'tcx>(infcx: &InferCtxt<'tcx>, impl_def_id: DefId) -> ty::ImplHeader<'tcx> { @@ -616,6 +627,7 @@ fn compute_intercrate_ambiguity_causes<'tcx>( } struct AmbiguityCausesVisitor<'a, 'tcx> { + cache: FxHashSet<Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>>, causes: &'a mut FxIndexSet<IntercrateAmbiguityCause<'tcx>>, } @@ -625,6 +637,10 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx> for AmbiguityCausesVisitor<'a, 'tcx> { } fn visit_goal(&mut self, goal: &InspectGoal<'_, 'tcx>) { + if !self.cache.insert(goal.goal()) { + return; + } + let infcx = goal.infcx(); for cand in goal.candidates() { cand.visit_nested_in_probe(self); @@ -749,5 +765,10 @@ fn search_ambiguity_causes<'tcx>( goal: Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>, causes: &mut FxIndexSet<IntercrateAmbiguityCause<'tcx>>, ) { - infcx.probe(|_| infcx.visit_proof_tree(goal, &mut AmbiguityCausesVisitor { causes })); + infcx.probe(|_| { + infcx.visit_proof_tree(goal, &mut AmbiguityCausesVisitor { + cache: Default::default(), + causes, + }) + }); } diff --git a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/mod.rs b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/mod.rs index 5b4e895189b..fcd195c8834 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/mod.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/mod.rs @@ -1390,10 +1390,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> { where OP: FnOnce(&mut Self) -> R, { - let (result, dep_node) = - self.tcx().dep_graph.with_anon_task(self.tcx(), dep_kinds::TraitSelect, || op(self)); - self.tcx().dep_graph.read_index(dep_node); - (result, dep_node) + self.tcx().dep_graph.with_anon_task(self.tcx(), dep_kinds::TraitSelect, || op(self)) } /// filter_impls filters candidates that have a positive impl for a negative |