about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/compiler/rustc_attr/messages.ftl
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2024-12-16rename rustc_attr to rustc_attr_parsing and create rustc_attr_data_structuresJonathan Dönszelmann-124/+0
2024-10-25Re-do recursive const stability checksRalf Jung-0/+3
Fundamentally, we have *three* disjoint categories of functions: 1. const-stable functions 2. private/unstable functions that are meant to be callable from const-stable functions 3. functions that can make use of unstable const features This PR implements the following system: - `#[rustc_const_stable]` puts functions in the first category. It may only be applied to `#[stable]` functions. - `#[rustc_const_unstable]` by default puts functions in the third category. The new attribute `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` can be added to such a function to move it into the second category. - `const fn` without a const stability marker are in the second category if they are still unstable. They automatically inherit the feature gate for regular calls, it can now also be used for const-calls. Also, several holes in recursive const stability checking are being closed. There's still one potential hole that is hard to avoid, which is when MIR building automatically inserts calls to a particular function in stable functions -- which happens in the panic machinery. Those need to *not* be `rustc_const_unstable` (or manually get a `rustc_const_stable_indirect`) to be sure they follow recursive const stability. But that's a fairly rare and special case so IMO it's fine. The net effect of this is that a `#[unstable]` or unmarked function can be constified simply by marking it as `const fn`, and it will then be const-callable from stable `const fn` and subject to recursive const stability requirements. If it is publicly reachable (which implies it cannot be unmarked), it will be const-unstable under the same feature gate. Only if the function ever becomes `#[stable]` does it need a `#[rustc_const_unstable]` or `#[rustc_const_stable]` marker to decide if this should also imply const-stability. Adding `#[rustc_const_unstable]` is only needed for (a) functions that need to use unstable const lang features (including intrinsics), or (b) `#[stable]` functions that are not yet intended to be const-stable. Adding `#[rustc_const_stable]` is only needed for functions that are actually meant to be directly callable from stable const code. `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` is used to mark intrinsics as const-callable and for `#[rustc_const_unstable]` functions that are actually called from other, exposed-on-stable `const fn`. No other attributes are required.
2024-10-04Improve non-boolean literal error in cfg predicateUrgau-0/+2
2024-08-10rustc_attr: make "compact `cfg(target(..))` is unstable" translatablePavel Grigorenko-0/+3
2024-03-03fix spans of arguments in diagnosticyukang-2/+2
2024-03-02Fix misleading message when using a named constant as a struct alignment/packyukang-0/+6
2023-10-23Validate `since` value in stable attributeDavid Tolnay-0/+3
2023-05-25Ensure Fluent messages are in alphabetical orderclubby789-64/+64
2023-03-11Simplify message pathsest31-0/+107
This makes it easier to open the messages file while developing on features. The commit was the result of automatted changes: for p in compiler/rustc_*; do mv $p/locales/en-US.ftl $p/messages.ftl; rmdir $p/locales; done for p in compiler/rustc_*; do sed -i "s#\.\./locales/en-US.ftl#../messages.ftl#" $p/src/lib.rs; done