about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/compiler/rustc_errors/src/registry.rs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2024-07-29Reformat `use` declarations.Nicholas Nethercote-1/+2
The previous commit updated `rustfmt.toml` appropriately. This commit is the outcome of running `x fmt --all` with the new formatting options.
2024-01-29Stop using `String` for error codes.Nicholas Nethercote-4/+5
Error codes are integers, but `String` is used everywhere to represent them. Gross! This commit introduces `ErrCode`, an integral newtype for error codes, replacing `String`. It also introduces a constant for every error code, e.g. `E0123`, and removes the `error_code!` macro. The constants are imported wherever used with `use rustc_errors::codes::*`. With the old code, we have three different ways to specify an error code at a use point: ``` error_code!(E0123) // macro call struct_span_code_err!(dcx, span, E0123, "msg"); // bare ident arg to macro call \#[diag(name, code = "E0123")] // string struct Diag; ``` With the new code, they all use the `E0123` constant. ``` E0123 // constant struct_span_code_err!(dcx, span, E0123, "msg"); // constant \#[diag(name, code = E0123)] // constant struct Diag; ``` The commit also changes the structure of the error code definitions: - `rustc_error_codes` now just defines a higher-order macro listing the used error codes and nothing else. - Because that's now the only thing in the `rustc_error_codes` crate, I moved it into the `lib.rs` file and removed the `error_codes.rs` file. - `rustc_errors` uses that macro to define everything, e.g. the error code constants and the `DIAGNOSTIC_TABLES`. This is in its new `codes.rs` file.
2023-02-26refactor: statically guarantee that current error codes are documentedEzra Shaw-8/+4
2021-03-27Remove (lots of) dead codeJoshua Nelson-4/+0
Found with https://github.com/est31/warnalyzer. Dubious changes: - Is anyone else using rustc_apfloat? I feel weird completely deleting x87 support. - Maybe some of the dead code in rustc_data_structures, in case someone wants to use it in the future? - Don't change rustc_serialize I plan to scrap most of the json module in the near future (see https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/418) and fixing the tests needed more work than I expected. TODO: check if any of the comments on the deleted code should be kept.
2020-08-30mv compiler to compiler/mark-0/+29