| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
to avoid overflow from proving `for<'a> opaque<'a>: Sized`
|
|
`-Znext-solver` allow `ExprKind::Call` for not-yet defined opaques
Based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/146329. Revival of rust-lang/rust#140496. See the comment on `OpaqueTypesJank`. I've used the following document while working on this https://hackmd.io/Js61f8PRTcyaiyqS-fH9iQ.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/181. It does introduce one subtle footgun we may want to handle before stabilization, opened https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/230 for that. Also cc https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/231 for deref and index operations
r? `@BoxyUwU`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The compiler just puts `DefId` in there, but rust-analyzer uses different types for each kind of item.
|
|
actually provide the correct args to coroutine witnesses
rust-lang/rust#145194 accidentally provided all arguments of the closure to the witness, but the witness only takes the generic parameters of the defining scope: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/216cdb7b22b637cef75b7225c642cb7587192643/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/closure.rs#L164
Fixes rust-lang/rust#145288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distinguish prepending and replacing self ty in predicates
There are two kinds of functions called `with_self_ty`:
1. Prepends the `Self` type onto an `ExistentialPredicate` which lacks it in its internal representation.
2. Replaces the `Self` type of an existing predicate, either for diagnostics purposes or in the new trait solver when normalizing that self type.
This PR distinguishes these two because I often want to only grep for one of them. Namely, let's call it `with_replaced_self_ty` when all we're doing is replacing the self type.
|
|
dont assemble shadowed impl candidates
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/109.
I've originally intended to fix this by supporting lazy reevaluation when rerunning cycles. This ended up being really difficult, see https://github.com/lcnr/search_graph for my notes used while working on this. It is also insufficient for the `rayon-hang-2.rs` test as we end up with goals which we need to rerun for all combinations of provisional results. While landing such an optimization in the future may still be desirable, it is very difficult and insufficient to fix these hangs. Also see the relevant [zulip thread](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/364551-t-types.2Ftrait-system-refactor/topic/rustc-rayon.20hang/near/527850058).
I was previously opposed to avoiding assembling shadowed impls as it may prevent future improvements in this area, cc rust-lang/rust#141226. Going to track this and the reasoning behind it in https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/226.
r? `@BoxyUwU` `@compiler-errors`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use let chains in the new solver
Self-explanatory
Let chains are stable as of today
r? lcnr
|
|
New const traits syntax
This PR only affects the AST and doesn't actually change anything semantically.
All occurrences of `~const` outside of libcore have been replaced by `[const]`. Within libcore we have to wait for rustfmt to be bumped in the bootstrap compiler. This will happen "automatically" (when rustfmt is run) during the bootstrap bump, as rustfmt converts `~const` into `[const]`. After this we can remove the `~const` support from the parser
Caveat discovered during impl: there is no legacy bare trait object recovery for `[const] Trait` as that snippet in type position goes down the slice /array parsing code and will error
r? ``@fee1-dead``
cc ``@nikomatsakis`` ``@traviscross`` ``@compiler-errors``
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expand the automatic implementation of `MetaSized` and `PointeeSized` so
that it is also implemented on non-`Sized` types, just not `ty::Foreign`
(extern type).
|
|
Introduce the `MetaSized` and `PointeeSized` traits as supertraits of
`Sized` and initially implement it on everything that currently
implements `Sized` to isolate any changes that simply adding the
traits introduces.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #135562 (Add ignore value suggestion in closure body)
- #139635 (Finalize repeat expr inference behaviour with inferred repeat counts)
- #139668 (Handle regions equivalent to 'static in non_local_bounds)
- #140218 (HIR ty lowering: Clean up & refactor the lowering of type-relative paths)
- #140435 (use uX::from instead of _ as uX in non - const contexts)
- #141130 (rustc_on_unimplemented cleanups)
- #141286 (Querify `coroutine_hidden_types`)
Failed merges:
- #140247 (Don't build `ParamEnv` and do trait solving in `ItemCtxt`s when lowering IATs)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
|
|
|
|
normalization: avoid incompletely constraining GAT args
We need to copy the behavior of #125214 in the new solver. This fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/202 which seems to be the cause of the regression in `deptypes`.
r? ```@compiler-errors```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #140056 (Fix a wrong error message in 2024 edition)
- #140220 (Fix detection of main function if there are expressions around it)
- #140249 (Remove `weak` alias terminology)
- #140316 (Introduce `BoxMarker` to improve pretty-printing correctness)
- #140347 (ci: clean more disk space in codebuild)
- #140349 (ci: use aws codebuild for the `dist-x86_64-linux` job)
- #140379 (rustc-dev-guide subtree update)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Remove `weak` alias terminology
I find the "weak" alias terminology to be quite confusing. It implies the existence of "strong" aliases (which do not exist) and I'm not really sure what about weak aliases is "weak". I much prefer "free alias" as the term. I think it's much more obvious what it means as "free function" is a well defined term that already exists in rust.
It's also a little confusing given "weak alias" is already a term in linker/codegen spaces which are part of the compiler too. Though I'm not particularly worried about that as it's usually very obvious if you're talking about the type system or not lol. I'm also currently trying to write documentation about aliases and it's somewhat awkward/confusing to be talking about *weak* aliases, when I'm not really sure what the basis for that as the term actually *is*.
I would also be happy to just find out there's a nice meaning behind calling them "weak" aliases :-)
r? `@oli-obk`
maybe we want a types MCP to decide on a specific naming here? or maybe we think its just too late to go back on this naming decision ^^'
|
|
async_drop_in_place::{closure}, scoped async drop added.
|
|
uwu :3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
